The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) Logan Talk Contributions 02:00, 18 January 2011 (UTC) reply
This article was previously deleted, but was given a second chance on the condition that it retain a neutral point of view. That has not happened. The article contains an overwhelming bias towards New Age philosophy, such as claiming in the intro that "This interaction might cause..." implicitly suggesting that it will happen, and describing The Shift of the Ages as a "masterwork" and Edgar Cayce as a "great healer". It also reads like an essay; there is an almost total reliance on primary sources, with no sense of context. I do believe that the photon belt is a notable New Age idea, but I can't see how to include this article without reducing it to one sentence. Serendi pod ous 11:16, 11 January 2011 (UTC) reply
If this article is to be kept, can I at least get it semi-protected, so it has time to breathe? Most of its edits have been from anonymous IPs. Serendi pod ous 16:27, 12 January 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) Logan Talk Contributions 02:00, 18 January 2011 (UTC) reply
This article was previously deleted, but was given a second chance on the condition that it retain a neutral point of view. That has not happened. The article contains an overwhelming bias towards New Age philosophy, such as claiming in the intro that "This interaction might cause..." implicitly suggesting that it will happen, and describing The Shift of the Ages as a "masterwork" and Edgar Cayce as a "great healer". It also reads like an essay; there is an almost total reliance on primary sources, with no sense of context. I do believe that the photon belt is a notable New Age idea, but I can't see how to include this article without reducing it to one sentence. Serendi pod ous 11:16, 11 January 2011 (UTC) reply
If this article is to be kept, can I at least get it semi-protected, so it has time to breathe? Most of its edits have been from anonymous IPs. Serendi pod ous 16:27, 12 January 2011 (UTC) reply