- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 09:00, 5 August 2018 (UTC)
Phillip Ozdemir
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Phillip Ozdemir ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Was deprodded without rationale or improvement. While accomplished, searches do not turn up enough indepth sourcing from independent reliable references to show they meet WP notability criteria as per WP:GNG or WP:NSCHOLAR. Onel5969 TT me 17:07, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:39, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:TNT and WP:NOTRESUME. This is a horrific mess. Pardon the analogy, but it needs to be nuked. The subject might be notable for one book that got reviews, but the rest is so much mindless trivia and egotistical naval-gazing that the article needs to be started from scratch. Bearian ( talk) 16:22, 2 August 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 09:00, 5 August 2018 (UTC)
Phillip Ozdemir
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Phillip Ozdemir ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Was deprodded without rationale or improvement. While accomplished, searches do not turn up enough indepth sourcing from independent reliable references to show they meet WP notability criteria as per WP:GNG or WP:NSCHOLAR. Onel5969 TT me 17:07, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:39, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:TNT and WP:NOTRESUME. This is a horrific mess. Pardon the analogy, but it needs to be nuked. The subject might be notable for one book that got reviews, but the rest is so much mindless trivia and egotistical naval-gazing that the article needs to be started from scratch. Bearian ( talk) 16:22, 2 August 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.