- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Yellow Dingo (talk) 00:49, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
Philippines at major beauty pageants
- Philippines at major beauty pageants ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unencyclopedic. Duplicates information elsewhere in a format that is not useful to the reader. MSJapan ( talk) 07:03, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 08:07, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 08:07, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 08:08, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, joe decker talk 01:17, 2 July 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, joe decker talk 01:17, 2 July 2016 (UTC)
- Keep – Meets WP:LISTPURP as a functional information source and navigational aid. This is evidenced by the significant number of page views the article receives, such as 5,217 in the last thirty days. North America 1000 03:27, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Music1201 talk 23:53, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Music1201 talk 23:53, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
- Keep – As per North America 1000. However, the article needs third party reliable sources. -- Richie Campbell ( talk) 01:03, 13 July 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Yellow Dingo (talk) 00:49, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
Philippines at major beauty pageants
- Philippines at major beauty pageants ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unencyclopedic. Duplicates information elsewhere in a format that is not useful to the reader. MSJapan ( talk) 07:03, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 08:07, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 08:07, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 08:08, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, joe decker talk 01:17, 2 July 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, joe decker talk 01:17, 2 July 2016 (UTC)
- Keep – Meets WP:LISTPURP as a functional information source and navigational aid. This is evidenced by the significant number of page views the article receives, such as 5,217 in the last thirty days. North America 1000 03:27, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Music1201 talk 23:53, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Music1201 talk 23:53, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
- Keep – As per North America 1000. However, the article needs third party reliable sources. -- Richie Campbell ( talk) 01:03, 13 July 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.