- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Participants argue that NACTOR is met here. Deletion rationale is underwhelming and not solidly based in policy or evidence of BEFORE. Liz Read! Talk! 01:25, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
Philip Daniel Bolden
AfDs for this article:
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Philip Daniel Bolden ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non notable. Minor roles. Bedivere ( talk) 01:46, 18 June 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers, Television, and Louisiana. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:19, 18 June 2024 (UTC)
- Strong Keep: The subject person clearly had lead roles in Are We There Yet? (see Screen Rant [1] and Republic TV [2]), Are We Done Yet? (see The New York Times [3] and BBC [4]), and Fly Me to the Moon (see NYT [5] and The Augusta Chronicle [6]), in addition to a supporting role in How to Eat Fried Worms (see Slant Magazine [7] and NYT [8]), so he clearly meets NACTOR#1. Besides, it was stated that the subject person has won one Young Artist Award and been nominated for another, which fulfills ANYBIO#1 for multiple nominations. I have noticed this is the second nomination of the same article, while the nominator has failed to provide any additional rationale or evidence from the previous discussion to demonstrate this article is non-notable. Unless the nominator can provide further elaboration, this appears to be an obvious keep case that may even qualify for a borderline speedy. — Prince of Erebor（ The Book of Mazarbul） 05:08, 18 June 2024 (UTC)
- Keep: WP:NACTOR seems indeed met. - My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 12:26, 18 June 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Participants argue that NACTOR is met here. Deletion rationale is underwhelming and not solidly based in policy or evidence of BEFORE. Liz Read! Talk! 01:25, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
Philip Daniel Bolden
AfDs for this article:
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Philip Daniel Bolden ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non notable. Minor roles. Bedivere ( talk) 01:46, 18 June 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers, Television, and Louisiana. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:19, 18 June 2024 (UTC)
- Strong Keep: The subject person clearly had lead roles in Are We There Yet? (see Screen Rant [1] and Republic TV [2]), Are We Done Yet? (see The New York Times [3] and BBC [4]), and Fly Me to the Moon (see NYT [5] and The Augusta Chronicle [6]), in addition to a supporting role in How to Eat Fried Worms (see Slant Magazine [7] and NYT [8]), so he clearly meets NACTOR#1. Besides, it was stated that the subject person has won one Young Artist Award and been nominated for another, which fulfills ANYBIO#1 for multiple nominations. I have noticed this is the second nomination of the same article, while the nominator has failed to provide any additional rationale or evidence from the previous discussion to demonstrate this article is non-notable. Unless the nominator can provide further elaboration, this appears to be an obvious keep case that may even qualify for a borderline speedy. — Prince of Erebor（ The Book of Mazarbul） 05:08, 18 June 2024 (UTC)
- Keep: WP:NACTOR seems indeed met. - My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 12:26, 18 June 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.