The result was Redirect all to List of Phil of the Future episodes, again there is no need for an article, if most of the info already in the parent page and again all those episode articles can not be deleted because of the GFDL. Jaranda wat's sup 20:52, 15 July 2007 (UTC) reply
Wikipedia is an encylopedia and not an episode guide. The only content in these articles is a plot summary and trivia, both considered inappropriate on their own. This also fails WP:EPISODE (and WP:FICT for that matter) for lack of "secondary sources about individual episodes". I'd also like to note that these episodes are also summarized at List_of_Phil_of_the_Future_episodes Corpx 08:21, 9 July 2007 (UTC) reply
A topic is presumed to be notable if it has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject.
Wikipedia articles on works of fiction should contain real-world context and sourced analysis, offering detail on a work's achievements, impact or historical significance.
Comment As of yet, nobody has provided a reason why any of the listed episodes are notable. The two episodes that have won awards are not up for deletion. An episode in a notable series is not automatically notable any more than a page in a notable book is automatically notable. Can someone who supports keeping the articles please provide an argument here? Otherwise we'll just be running in circles forever. -- Smtomak 23:22, 13 July 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was Redirect all to List of Phil of the Future episodes, again there is no need for an article, if most of the info already in the parent page and again all those episode articles can not be deleted because of the GFDL. Jaranda wat's sup 20:52, 15 July 2007 (UTC) reply
Wikipedia is an encylopedia and not an episode guide. The only content in these articles is a plot summary and trivia, both considered inappropriate on their own. This also fails WP:EPISODE (and WP:FICT for that matter) for lack of "secondary sources about individual episodes". I'd also like to note that these episodes are also summarized at List_of_Phil_of_the_Future_episodes Corpx 08:21, 9 July 2007 (UTC) reply
A topic is presumed to be notable if it has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject.
Wikipedia articles on works of fiction should contain real-world context and sourced analysis, offering detail on a work's achievements, impact or historical significance.
Comment As of yet, nobody has provided a reason why any of the listed episodes are notable. The two episodes that have won awards are not up for deletion. An episode in a notable series is not automatically notable any more than a page in a notable book is automatically notable. Can someone who supports keeping the articles please provide an argument here? Otherwise we'll just be running in circles forever. -- Smtomak 23:22, 13 July 2007 (UTC) reply