The result of the debate was delete. — Kirill Lok s hin 02:27, 25 January 2006 (UTC) reply
Delete: hoax, original research at best: no corroborating Google results [1], sole edits by the two creators User:65.205.39.146 and User:Pherotone PhD, no efforts to cite sources in the month it's been tagged as unreferenced. Supposed blog of a researcher, which links to article, clearly supports "original research" theory. See talk page for viral marketing speculation - c3o 15:23, 19 January 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete. — Kirill Lok s hin 02:27, 25 January 2006 (UTC) reply
Delete: hoax, original research at best: no corroborating Google results [1], sole edits by the two creators User:65.205.39.146 and User:Pherotone PhD, no efforts to cite sources in the month it's been tagged as unreferenced. Supposed blog of a researcher, which links to article, clearly supports "original research" theory. See talk page for viral marketing speculation - c3o 15:23, 19 January 2006 (UTC) reply