- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) ~SS49~ {talk} 17:08, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
Phase 2 metro station
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Phase 2 metro station ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Wikipedia does not require an article for a tiny little metro station. I don't see any way this article can be expanded. User:cool12y —Preceding undated comment added 16:13, 24 February 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 22:32, 24 February 2019 (UTC)
- Keep - First of all, it's not tiny. It's a major metro station on a major line. Such stations are considered inherently notable. It's impossible for a public works station of this magnitude to not have extensive government reports or proposals, studies, budgets, environmental assessments, etc.. The article can easily be expanded just like any other metro station, like Janakpuri West metro station for example. Content such as the history, layout, relation to the community it serves and other transit connections can be added. Oakshade ( talk) 23:39, 24 February 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 13:32, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
- Keep. It has generally been accepted that all railway stations are notable. -- Necrothesp ( talk) 14:12, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
- Speedy Keep. Agree with other users above. It only needs more work. -- Hiwilms ( talk) 18:16, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
- Keep,I agree, It's a major metro station and has WP:GNG -- SalmanZ ( talk) 23:44, 1 March 2019 (UTC)
- Keep inherently notable despite the undescriptive article. Pinguinn 🐧 05:46, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
- Keep - article needs more work. MGhazi ( talk) 09:46, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) ~SS49~ {talk} 17:08, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
Phase 2 metro station
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Phase 2 metro station ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Wikipedia does not require an article for a tiny little metro station. I don't see any way this article can be expanded. User:cool12y —Preceding undated comment added 16:13, 24 February 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 22:32, 24 February 2019 (UTC)
- Keep - First of all, it's not tiny. It's a major metro station on a major line. Such stations are considered inherently notable. It's impossible for a public works station of this magnitude to not have extensive government reports or proposals, studies, budgets, environmental assessments, etc.. The article can easily be expanded just like any other metro station, like Janakpuri West metro station for example. Content such as the history, layout, relation to the community it serves and other transit connections can be added. Oakshade ( talk) 23:39, 24 February 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 13:32, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
- Keep. It has generally been accepted that all railway stations are notable. -- Necrothesp ( talk) 14:12, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
- Speedy Keep. Agree with other users above. It only needs more work. -- Hiwilms ( talk) 18:16, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
- Keep,I agree, It's a major metro station and has WP:GNG -- SalmanZ ( talk) 23:44, 1 March 2019 (UTC)
- Keep inherently notable despite the undescriptive article. Pinguinn 🐧 05:46, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
- Keep - article needs more work. MGhazi ( talk) 09:46, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.