- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 19:26, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
- Pets Keeping in Tanzania ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Topic cannot provide enough coverage to justify a separate article. -- Pingumeister( talk) 13:58, 31 August 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log ( step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2017 August 31. — cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 14:26, 31 August 2017 (UTC)
- Delete: while pet-keeping is obviously notable, as is Tanzania, put them together and you don't have a topic notable enough for its own page. A sub-section in Pet is, at the very most, all this article deserves. The article is also written like an essay and appears to contain original research. DrStrauss talk 15:24, 31 August 2017 (UTC)
- Delete unless substantially changed. Article duplicates general advice on pet ownership and does nothing to demonstrate the notability of the specific topic. There may be Tanzania-specific material on pet-keeping, covering national laws, local organisations, etc, so it may be possible to write a valid Wikipedia article. But there's currently nothing in this article specific to Tanzania. -- Colapeninsula ( talk) 15:27, 31 August 2017 (UTC)
- Compare Animal welfare in the United Kingdom, the national subsections of Dog licence, or Dangerous Dogs Act 1991, for valid articles about animal ownership in one country. -- Colapeninsula ( talk) 15:30, 31 August 2017 (UTC)
- Delete - The information is generic and the subject is not sufficiently notable to have a separate article for Tanzania. Cwmhiraeth ( talk) 11:32, 2 September 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 19:26, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
- Pets Keeping in Tanzania ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Topic cannot provide enough coverage to justify a separate article. -- Pingumeister( talk) 13:58, 31 August 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log ( step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2017 August 31. — cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 14:26, 31 August 2017 (UTC)
- Delete: while pet-keeping is obviously notable, as is Tanzania, put them together and you don't have a topic notable enough for its own page. A sub-section in Pet is, at the very most, all this article deserves. The article is also written like an essay and appears to contain original research. DrStrauss talk 15:24, 31 August 2017 (UTC)
- Delete unless substantially changed. Article duplicates general advice on pet ownership and does nothing to demonstrate the notability of the specific topic. There may be Tanzania-specific material on pet-keeping, covering national laws, local organisations, etc, so it may be possible to write a valid Wikipedia article. But there's currently nothing in this article specific to Tanzania. -- Colapeninsula ( talk) 15:27, 31 August 2017 (UTC)
- Compare Animal welfare in the United Kingdom, the national subsections of Dog licence, or Dangerous Dogs Act 1991, for valid articles about animal ownership in one country. -- Colapeninsula ( talk) 15:30, 31 August 2017 (UTC)
- Delete - The information is generic and the subject is not sufficiently notable to have a separate article for Tanzania. Cwmhiraeth ( talk) 11:32, 2 September 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.