- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 18:17, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
- Petey and Jaydee ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
There's no evidence to suggest this is still active and the new external link is now closed and my own searches only found a few links here and nothing good, thus with no signs of improvement and existing like this since February 2007, there's nothing to suggest keeping.
Previous AFD closed as "No Consensus" when the AFD had no "Keep" arguments whatsoever. "No objection" may have been more appropriate. Relisting. Toddst1 ( talk) 00:19, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 01:41, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 01:41, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 01:42, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
- Delete - Subject has a lot of hits on Google but no reliable sources covering it in detail for support. Meatsgains ( talk) 01:47, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
- Delete - article currently does not provide enough sourcing, and searches revealed absolutely nothing except a single hit to YouTube. Onel5969 TT me 01:59, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
- Delete as there's still nothing convincing. SwisterTwister talk 02:10, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
- Delete as there isn't any reliable, credible sources to support the subject having its own page. Aoba47 ( talk) 23:55, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 18:17, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
- Petey and Jaydee ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
There's no evidence to suggest this is still active and the new external link is now closed and my own searches only found a few links here and nothing good, thus with no signs of improvement and existing like this since February 2007, there's nothing to suggest keeping.
Previous AFD closed as "No Consensus" when the AFD had no "Keep" arguments whatsoever. "No objection" may have been more appropriate. Relisting. Toddst1 ( talk) 00:19, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 01:41, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 01:41, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 01:42, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
- Delete - Subject has a lot of hits on Google but no reliable sources covering it in detail for support. Meatsgains ( talk) 01:47, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
- Delete - article currently does not provide enough sourcing, and searches revealed absolutely nothing except a single hit to YouTube. Onel5969 TT me 01:59, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
- Delete as there's still nothing convincing. SwisterTwister talk 02:10, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
- Delete as there isn't any reliable, credible sources to support the subject having its own page. Aoba47 ( talk) 23:55, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.