The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete exegetical posting without sourcing appears to be
WP:OR.
Carlossuarez46 05:01, 2 October 2007 (UTC)reply
Delete OR. However, I think should consider converting all our articles to that format. -
Rocket000 06:23, 2 October 2007 (UTC)reply
Query: Huh? It doesn't even have any formatting. It is bare ASCII text. — SMcCandlish [
talk] [
cont] ‹(-¿-)› 15:42, 2 October 2007 (UTC)reply
Sorry, bad joke. :)
Rocket000 19:07, 2 October 2007 (UTC)reply
Delete This seems to be an obscure debate within Islam about how souls are named on reaching heaven
[1]. The limited reading I've done indicates that it's disputed in any event. Until
WP:NPOV and
WP:OR can be satisfied, it should go. --Rodhullandemu (
talk -
contribs) 14:28, 2 October 2007 (UTC)reply
Speedy delete per
WP:COPYRIGHT; this is clearly a copy-paste of someone's material from a message board or blog, and we have zero evidence that the poster of it here was the original author (though perhaps related; they share "Ammar" in their names). — SMcCandlish [
talk] [
cont] ‹(-¿-)› 15:45, 2 October 2007 (UTC)reply
Comment it's from here
[2] or here
[3] and are straight lifts from Islamic texts. AFAIK Allah has not released these texts under GFDL. --Rodhullandemu (
talk -
contribs) 00:19, 3 October 2007 (UTC)reply
Delete incomprehensible list.
JJL 13:22, 3 October 2007 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete exegetical posting without sourcing appears to be
WP:OR.
Carlossuarez46 05:01, 2 October 2007 (UTC)reply
Delete OR. However, I think should consider converting all our articles to that format. -
Rocket000 06:23, 2 October 2007 (UTC)reply
Query: Huh? It doesn't even have any formatting. It is bare ASCII text. — SMcCandlish [
talk] [
cont] ‹(-¿-)› 15:42, 2 October 2007 (UTC)reply
Sorry, bad joke. :)
Rocket000 19:07, 2 October 2007 (UTC)reply
Delete This seems to be an obscure debate within Islam about how souls are named on reaching heaven
[1]. The limited reading I've done indicates that it's disputed in any event. Until
WP:NPOV and
WP:OR can be satisfied, it should go. --Rodhullandemu (
talk -
contribs) 14:28, 2 October 2007 (UTC)reply
Speedy delete per
WP:COPYRIGHT; this is clearly a copy-paste of someone's material from a message board or blog, and we have zero evidence that the poster of it here was the original author (though perhaps related; they share "Ammar" in their names). — SMcCandlish [
talk] [
cont] ‹(-¿-)› 15:45, 2 October 2007 (UTC)reply
Comment it's from here
[2] or here
[3] and are straight lifts from Islamic texts. AFAIK Allah has not released these texts under GFDL. --Rodhullandemu (
talk -
contribs) 00:19, 3 October 2007 (UTC)reply
Delete incomprehensible list.
JJL 13:22, 3 October 2007 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.