From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk) 08:51, 7 April 2020 (UTC) reply

Peaches Boutique (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article went through AfC, by an editor who only worked on this article, and has a promotional tone (number of dresses the store has, a quote from the store manager, etc.) WP:CORP has guidelines on what makes a company notable, and I don't see that being met here. The Chicago Tribute article is in a significant publication, about prom dress shopping at this store, but it's more about prom dress shopping than the store itself. The Daily Journal mention is trivial (one line and a quote from the store manager.) There's a semi-recent WGN story about Peaches that GNews turns up, but it's very short and not significant.

The fluff can go but this store doesn't seem to meet the notability guidelines for businesses. Mr. Vernon ( talk) 01:14, 31 March 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Mr. Vernon ( talk) 01:14, 31 March 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. Mr. Vernon ( talk) 01:14, 31 March 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. Mr. Vernon ( talk) 01:14, 31 March 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 05:16, 31 March 2020 (UTC) reply
Delete There is nothing proving that the store is notable enough on its own; I suggest getting an admin to delete it without further delay. RedBulbBlueBlood9911 ( talk) 10:32, 1 April 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk) 08:51, 7 April 2020 (UTC) reply

Peaches Boutique (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article went through AfC, by an editor who only worked on this article, and has a promotional tone (number of dresses the store has, a quote from the store manager, etc.) WP:CORP has guidelines on what makes a company notable, and I don't see that being met here. The Chicago Tribute article is in a significant publication, about prom dress shopping at this store, but it's more about prom dress shopping than the store itself. The Daily Journal mention is trivial (one line and a quote from the store manager.) There's a semi-recent WGN story about Peaches that GNews turns up, but it's very short and not significant.

The fluff can go but this store doesn't seem to meet the notability guidelines for businesses. Mr. Vernon ( talk) 01:14, 31 March 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Mr. Vernon ( talk) 01:14, 31 March 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. Mr. Vernon ( talk) 01:14, 31 March 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. Mr. Vernon ( talk) 01:14, 31 March 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 05:16, 31 March 2020 (UTC) reply
Delete There is nothing proving that the store is notable enough on its own; I suggest getting an admin to delete it without further delay. RedBulbBlueBlood9911 ( talk) 10:32, 1 April 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook