The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Weak keep -- It is not necessarily appropriate to merge an ancient city with a modern one, when there is no obvious continuity (gap of 500 years in history) and a different name. I recall a case of Greek city in Asia Minor that some one wanted to merge with is modern Turkish near successor.
Peterkingiron (
talk)
16:11, 14 November 2021 (UTC)reply
Weak keep - I've listed below some literature studying aspects of Pautalia, such as its coins and urban development (both mentioned in the WP article). The article is poorly written in its current state, but it could stubified now and rewritten with proper sourcing, as Curbon7 said.
Bridget(talk)19:10, 25 November 2021 (UTC)reply
Grozdanova, Lily (2016). Delev, Peter (ed.). "Градският пантеон на Пауталия в светлината на монетосеченето на полиса – някои основни наблюдения" [The city Pantheon of Pautalia in the light of the polis’ coinage – some basic observations]. ΣΥΜΠΟΣΙΟΝ (in Russian). Sofia: St. Kliment Ohridski University Press: 136–147.
ISBN978-954-07-4158-1.
Topoi entry.
Sokolowski, Franciszek (1970). "Loi sacrée de Pautalia". Bulletin de correspondance hellénique (in French). 94 (1): 113–116.
doi:
10.3406/bch.1970.2170.
Filipova, S.S. (2018). "Монеты из раскопок античной Пауталии (современный Кюстендил)" [Coins from Archeological Researches of Ancient Pautalia (Today Kyustendil)]. Materials in Archaeology & History of Ancient & Medieval Crimea (in Russian) (10): 415–435.
doi:
10.24411/2219-8857-2018-00018.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Weak keep -- It is not necessarily appropriate to merge an ancient city with a modern one, when there is no obvious continuity (gap of 500 years in history) and a different name. I recall a case of Greek city in Asia Minor that some one wanted to merge with is modern Turkish near successor.
Peterkingiron (
talk)
16:11, 14 November 2021 (UTC)reply
Weak keep - I've listed below some literature studying aspects of Pautalia, such as its coins and urban development (both mentioned in the WP article). The article is poorly written in its current state, but it could stubified now and rewritten with proper sourcing, as Curbon7 said.
Bridget(talk)19:10, 25 November 2021 (UTC)reply
Grozdanova, Lily (2016). Delev, Peter (ed.). "Градският пантеон на Пауталия в светлината на монетосеченето на полиса – някои основни наблюдения" [The city Pantheon of Pautalia in the light of the polis’ coinage – some basic observations]. ΣΥΜΠΟΣΙΟΝ (in Russian). Sofia: St. Kliment Ohridski University Press: 136–147.
ISBN978-954-07-4158-1.
Topoi entry.
Sokolowski, Franciszek (1970). "Loi sacrée de Pautalia". Bulletin de correspondance hellénique (in French). 94 (1): 113–116.
doi:
10.3406/bch.1970.2170.
Filipova, S.S. (2018). "Монеты из раскопок античной Пауталии (современный Кюстендил)" [Coins from Archeological Researches of Ancient Pautalia (Today Kyustendil)]. Materials in Archaeology & History of Ancient & Medieval Crimea (in Russian) (10): 415–435.
doi:
10.24411/2219-8857-2018-00018.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.