- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:23, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
Patrick Buckley
- Patrick Buckley ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable clergyman with scant coverage due to his sexuality and wedding. Blatantly fails WP:GNG. FoCuS contribs; talk to me! 17:24, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp ( talk) 16:33, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp ( talk) 16:33, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 04:17, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 04:17, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
- Comment -- Episcopal ordination (even though not papally authorised) might just make him notable, but I am unsure. Peterkingiron ( talk) 19:33, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 00:42, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 00:42, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
- Delete as questionable for the applicable notability. SwisterTwister talk 20:09, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
- Delete - Clearly doesn't meet WP:GNG. There are also blp concerns regarding the tone of the article. Onel5969 TT me 12:51, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:23, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
Patrick Buckley
- Patrick Buckley ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable clergyman with scant coverage due to his sexuality and wedding. Blatantly fails WP:GNG. FoCuS contribs; talk to me! 17:24, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp ( talk) 16:33, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp ( talk) 16:33, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 04:17, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 04:17, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
- Comment -- Episcopal ordination (even though not papally authorised) might just make him notable, but I am unsure. Peterkingiron ( talk) 19:33, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 00:42, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 00:42, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
- Delete as questionable for the applicable notability. SwisterTwister talk 20:09, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
- Delete - Clearly doesn't meet WP:GNG. There are also blp concerns regarding the tone of the article. Onel5969 TT me 12:51, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.