The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Note: This discussion has been included in
WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions.
Matthew_hktc 08:52, 20 August 2018 (UTC)reply
Delete and SALT - no evidence of notability.
GiantSnowman 09:40, 20 August 2018 (UTC)reply
Keep This club plays in the third tier of Indian football and I can't believe it isn't a notable organisation. If you search for the club's name in Bengali (পাঠচক্র), it gets over 2,000 Google News hits – I can't tell how many of these are GNG-meeting coverage, but I'd be surprised if there was nothing – we really need a Bengali speaker to advise. Nominating this for deletion without a cursory search in the relevant language is leaning towards
WP:SYSTEMATICBIAS. @
GiantSnowman: Don't know if you want to reconsider. Cheers,
Number57 17:29, 20 August 2018 (UTC)reply
So far the current version is no difference with the first AfD discussion (F dot C nodot). Google hit mean nothing, it should be required to be shown in the article for any language source as
WP:verify and they should be non-routine. Just saying stuff not shown on the article may make the club passing
WP:GNG, fails verifiability.
Matthew_hktc 19:03, 20 August 2018 (UTC)reply
It doesn't seem as if you've followed
WP:BEFORE though – did you check the Bengali sources? If not, how can you claim it fails
WP:GNG?
This news website has a few stories about the club for a start.
Number57 19:23, 20 August 2018 (UTC)reply
What i only saw similar article title
Pathachakra FC was userfiy to
Draft:Pathachakra FC and then abandoned, while the current version
Pathachakra F.C. may qualify CSD G4 (as the recreation of
Pathachakra F.C). It make no point in an encyclopedia that merely a collection of squad list, as well as lack of user to build a true article with brief club history (even lack of machine translation by google). The current version may survived as a draft by userify again, but club history is not dynamic, squad list is. If people want squad list, google themselves. See also
Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not.
Matthew_hktc 19:38, 20 August 2018 (UTC)reply
It doesn't qualify for
WP:G4 as this is its first AfD.
SportingFlyertalk 00:49, 10 September 2018 (UTC)reply
Comment - This is an annual ritual. Non-notable CFL club pages get created every time CFL rolls around. These pages are almost always created with no
reliable sources. CFL is a third-tier league in India, so the club pages may be eligible for notability, but it has to have notability established.
Coderzombie (
talk) 02:55, 21 August 2018 (UTC)reply
Delete. Doesn't a third-tier club, by definition, fail
WP:FOOTY?
Ifnord (
talk) 21:18, 28 August 2018 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Two opinions for delete, two for keep. I see that more research may need to be done here.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Redditaddict69 21:49, 28 August 2018 (UTC)reply
Keep - per Number 57, I think this club is (just) notable enough.
Inter&anthro (
talk) 02:17, 4 September 2018 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 14:25, 4 September 2018 (UTC)reply
Keep don't have time to flesh out the argument at the moment, but a simple before search shows the topic has been covered in several different news sources all covering the Calcutta league. Needs improvement, not deletion, as they say.
SportingFlyertalk 06:27, 8 September 2018 (UTC)reply
Delete-I'm a native Bengali speaker and all the local coverage is centered around CFL and of player sign-ups.Pinging @
Number 57:.Clear-cut NFOOTY failure.
∯WBGconverse 17:08, 10 September 2018 (UTC)reply
Delete as per nom and WBG's analysis of the sources, except the link is
WP:FOOTYN and not
WP:NFOOTY which is just for bios and not the clubs. Shame the project didn't find a less confusing name. I don't understand why @
SportingFlyer: you say it doesn't meet G4 this seems to be exactly the same club as
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pathachakra F.C except for the final full stop. Salt as per
User:GiantSnowman.--
Dom from Paris (
talk) 23:55, 10 September 2018 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Note: This discussion has been included in
WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions.
Matthew_hktc 08:52, 20 August 2018 (UTC)reply
Delete and SALT - no evidence of notability.
GiantSnowman 09:40, 20 August 2018 (UTC)reply
Keep This club plays in the third tier of Indian football and I can't believe it isn't a notable organisation. If you search for the club's name in Bengali (পাঠচক্র), it gets over 2,000 Google News hits – I can't tell how many of these are GNG-meeting coverage, but I'd be surprised if there was nothing – we really need a Bengali speaker to advise. Nominating this for deletion without a cursory search in the relevant language is leaning towards
WP:SYSTEMATICBIAS. @
GiantSnowman: Don't know if you want to reconsider. Cheers,
Number57 17:29, 20 August 2018 (UTC)reply
So far the current version is no difference with the first AfD discussion (F dot C nodot). Google hit mean nothing, it should be required to be shown in the article for any language source as
WP:verify and they should be non-routine. Just saying stuff not shown on the article may make the club passing
WP:GNG, fails verifiability.
Matthew_hktc 19:03, 20 August 2018 (UTC)reply
It doesn't seem as if you've followed
WP:BEFORE though – did you check the Bengali sources? If not, how can you claim it fails
WP:GNG?
This news website has a few stories about the club for a start.
Number57 19:23, 20 August 2018 (UTC)reply
What i only saw similar article title
Pathachakra FC was userfiy to
Draft:Pathachakra FC and then abandoned, while the current version
Pathachakra F.C. may qualify CSD G4 (as the recreation of
Pathachakra F.C). It make no point in an encyclopedia that merely a collection of squad list, as well as lack of user to build a true article with brief club history (even lack of machine translation by google). The current version may survived as a draft by userify again, but club history is not dynamic, squad list is. If people want squad list, google themselves. See also
Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not.
Matthew_hktc 19:38, 20 August 2018 (UTC)reply
It doesn't qualify for
WP:G4 as this is its first AfD.
SportingFlyertalk 00:49, 10 September 2018 (UTC)reply
Comment - This is an annual ritual. Non-notable CFL club pages get created every time CFL rolls around. These pages are almost always created with no
reliable sources. CFL is a third-tier league in India, so the club pages may be eligible for notability, but it has to have notability established.
Coderzombie (
talk) 02:55, 21 August 2018 (UTC)reply
Delete. Doesn't a third-tier club, by definition, fail
WP:FOOTY?
Ifnord (
talk) 21:18, 28 August 2018 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Two opinions for delete, two for keep. I see that more research may need to be done here.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Redditaddict69 21:49, 28 August 2018 (UTC)reply
Keep - per Number 57, I think this club is (just) notable enough.
Inter&anthro (
talk) 02:17, 4 September 2018 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 14:25, 4 September 2018 (UTC)reply
Keep don't have time to flesh out the argument at the moment, but a simple before search shows the topic has been covered in several different news sources all covering the Calcutta league. Needs improvement, not deletion, as they say.
SportingFlyertalk 06:27, 8 September 2018 (UTC)reply
Delete-I'm a native Bengali speaker and all the local coverage is centered around CFL and of player sign-ups.Pinging @
Number 57:.Clear-cut NFOOTY failure.
∯WBGconverse 17:08, 10 September 2018 (UTC)reply
Delete as per nom and WBG's analysis of the sources, except the link is
WP:FOOTYN and not
WP:NFOOTY which is just for bios and not the clubs. Shame the project didn't find a less confusing name. I don't understand why @
SportingFlyer: you say it doesn't meet G4 this seems to be exactly the same club as
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pathachakra F.C except for the final full stop. Salt as per
User:GiantSnowman.--
Dom from Paris (
talk) 23:55, 10 September 2018 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.