- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Clear consensus that there is sufficient sourcing available to demonstrate notability - and that both sourcing and content can be significant enhanced via the Czech version of the article (non-admin closure) Nosebagbear ( talk) 11:02, 30 November 2018 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Parukářka Park ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not notable. Nothing other than "This place exists" and a few TripAdvisor reviews, which is not a WP:RS [ Username Needed 15:43, 23 November 2018 (UTC)
- Comment: If I remember correctly, this park is decent in size. Surely there is some information about the park's features and history. Let us please keep in mind, there more be Czech-language sourcing than English-language sourcing. I've posted a note at WikiProject Czech Republic asking members to weigh in on this discussion. --- Another Believer ( Talk) 16:00, 23 November 2018 (UTC)
- Update: I vote Keep, based on the Czech Wikipedia article: cs:Vrch sv. Kříže. Please note, the English Wikipedia article has a banner saying, "This article may be expanded with text translated from the corresponding article in Czech." Furthermore, Czech Wikipedia has a separate article for cs:Protiatomový bunkr Parukářka, a fallout shelter located in the park. Surely these two articles combined demonstrate evidence of notability for at least one article here at English Wikipedia. --- Another Believer ( Talk) 16:02, 23 November 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the
list of Czech Republic-related deletion discussions.
CAPTAIN RAJU
(T)
17:47, 23 November 2018 (UTC)
- The czwiki aricle uses the same sources as the enwiki one.[ Username Needed 10:08, 26 November 2018 (UTC)
- Keep. Prominent, well-known and popular public park in Prague. Unfortunately the article here is just a pitiful stub, however the room for expansion is definitely there.-- Darwinek ( talk) 20:00, 23 November 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 04:17, 25 November 2018 (UTC)
- Keep. I agree with Darwinek. There are many independent and reliable sources mentioning various meetings, festivals [1] and also problems with planned construction in/around the park. [2] [3]. A notable geographical location, just check G-search for Parukářka Žižkov. Vejvančický ( talk / contribs) 16:26, 26 November 2018 (UTC)
- Keep seems pass GNG. CASSIOPEIA( talk)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Clear consensus that there is sufficient sourcing available to demonstrate notability - and that both sourcing and content can be significant enhanced via the Czech version of the article (non-admin closure) Nosebagbear ( talk) 11:02, 30 November 2018 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Parukářka Park ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not notable. Nothing other than "This place exists" and a few TripAdvisor reviews, which is not a WP:RS [ Username Needed 15:43, 23 November 2018 (UTC)
- Comment: If I remember correctly, this park is decent in size. Surely there is some information about the park's features and history. Let us please keep in mind, there more be Czech-language sourcing than English-language sourcing. I've posted a note at WikiProject Czech Republic asking members to weigh in on this discussion. --- Another Believer ( Talk) 16:00, 23 November 2018 (UTC)
- Update: I vote Keep, based on the Czech Wikipedia article: cs:Vrch sv. Kříže. Please note, the English Wikipedia article has a banner saying, "This article may be expanded with text translated from the corresponding article in Czech." Furthermore, Czech Wikipedia has a separate article for cs:Protiatomový bunkr Parukářka, a fallout shelter located in the park. Surely these two articles combined demonstrate evidence of notability for at least one article here at English Wikipedia. --- Another Believer ( Talk) 16:02, 23 November 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the
list of Czech Republic-related deletion discussions.
CAPTAIN RAJU
(T)
17:47, 23 November 2018 (UTC)
- The czwiki aricle uses the same sources as the enwiki one.[ Username Needed 10:08, 26 November 2018 (UTC)
- Keep. Prominent, well-known and popular public park in Prague. Unfortunately the article here is just a pitiful stub, however the room for expansion is definitely there.-- Darwinek ( talk) 20:00, 23 November 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 04:17, 25 November 2018 (UTC)
- Keep. I agree with Darwinek. There are many independent and reliable sources mentioning various meetings, festivals [1] and also problems with planned construction in/around the park. [2] [3]. A notable geographical location, just check G-search for Parukářka Žižkov. Vejvančický ( talk / contribs) 16:26, 26 November 2018 (UTC)
- Keep seems pass GNG. CASSIOPEIA( talk)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.