- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Seems reasonable consensus that with additional sources, notability requirements are met (non-admin closure) Nosebagbear ( talk) 11:39, 4 August 2018 (UTC)
Parque Naucalli
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Parque Naucalli ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Crappy bot article. Non-notable park which PROD was removed without reason. » Shadowowl | talk 12:08, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Popular culture-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 ( 🗣️ Talk • ✍️ Contributions) Please ping me if you had replied 10:17, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 ( 🗣️ Talk • ✍️ Contributions) Please ping me if you had replied 10:17, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Spain-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 ( 🗣️ Talk • ✍️ Contributions) Please ping me if you had replied 10:17, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
- Keep There seem to be enough sources in Spanish to support a decent article. I've added one in order to ensure the article has a source. SportingFlyer talk 04:12, 26 July 2018 (UTC)
- Comment Not sure it shows notability but I do like this source for developing the article: [1] SportingFlyer talk 04:27, 26 July 2018 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Joe ( talk) 14:41, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Joe ( talk) 14:41, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Mexico-related deletion discussions. Eastmain ( talk • contribs) 15:15, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
- Keep. The article is now adequately sourced. Eastmain ( talk • contribs) 15:17, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
- Keep. Article has been further sourced, the location is an important park in Mexico City. There is no need to go all in on the deletion of articles based on who started them, and nominator's terse PROD was removed by Northamerica1000 with a perfectly good reason for which they desserve thanks. Sam Sailor 13:45, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
- Keep. Satisfies GNG. James500 ( talk) 05:46, 1 August 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Seems reasonable consensus that with additional sources, notability requirements are met (non-admin closure) Nosebagbear ( talk) 11:39, 4 August 2018 (UTC)
Parque Naucalli
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Parque Naucalli ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Crappy bot article. Non-notable park which PROD was removed without reason. » Shadowowl | talk 12:08, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Popular culture-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 ( 🗣️ Talk • ✍️ Contributions) Please ping me if you had replied 10:17, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 ( 🗣️ Talk • ✍️ Contributions) Please ping me if you had replied 10:17, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Spain-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 ( 🗣️ Talk • ✍️ Contributions) Please ping me if you had replied 10:17, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
- Keep There seem to be enough sources in Spanish to support a decent article. I've added one in order to ensure the article has a source. SportingFlyer talk 04:12, 26 July 2018 (UTC)
- Comment Not sure it shows notability but I do like this source for developing the article: [1] SportingFlyer talk 04:27, 26 July 2018 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Joe ( talk) 14:41, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Joe ( talk) 14:41, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Mexico-related deletion discussions. Eastmain ( talk • contribs) 15:15, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
- Keep. The article is now adequately sourced. Eastmain ( talk • contribs) 15:17, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
- Keep. Article has been further sourced, the location is an important park in Mexico City. There is no need to go all in on the deletion of articles based on who started them, and nominator's terse PROD was removed by Northamerica1000 with a perfectly good reason for which they desserve thanks. Sam Sailor 13:45, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
- Keep. Satisfies GNG. James500 ( talk) 05:46, 1 August 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.