The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
PROD declined for reasons I can't possibly fathom. This is a dumpsite of no particular notability, therefore the article should be deleted. There is no reason to maintain it under
WP:GEO. ♠
PMC♠
(talk)04:15, 6 June 2018 (UTC)reply
Comment I removed the PROD because the original concern (that it incorrectly labeled the subject as a village) was addressed. I did not check for notability. Maybe sources exist in the local languages? –
LaundryPizza03 (
dc̄)
15:25, 6 June 2018 (UTC)reply
Comment the stub as it stands isn't good, but a search did come up with a few sources in three different languages. I'm not saying it's notable or not notable - would this be infrastructure under
WP:GEOFEAT? There's a chance it's notable and could be expanded.
SportingFlyertalk18:26, 6 June 2018 (UTC)reply
Spinningspark, I'd support a merge, but I don't think there's enough substantial coverage (on what you've posted anyway) to support a keep. That book result you posted is a single paragraph in a tour guide type book, it's not that substantive. ♠
PMC♠
(talk)19:58, 9 June 2018 (UTC)reply
Comment. This page originally described Parkietenbos as a village. There is some evidence in sources that this is a populated place as several businesses give it as their address:
Rodoco Shipping and Trading SA[12],
Aruba All Cargo Co.,
Demo Aruba MV,
Ecury Motors, Ltd. This book
description of the dump says the dump is "located in Parkietenbos", not that the dump is called Parkietenbos. As a populated place this should be kept per
WP:GEOLAND. At the very least we can say that there is more going on there than just a dump. Also
Historia di Aruba: 1499-1824 mentions Parkietenbos but I can't make any sense of the google machine translation of "Nan a establece nan mes na diferente lugar, entre otro na Daimari, Santa Marta, Buena Vista y Parkietenbos principalmente. Asina e teranan cerca yama "cunuco" a bin den existencia. Cada colonizador a desaroya nan pida tereno..." At least we can say from that that the place existed historically.
SpinningSpark22:29, 9 June 2018 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
PROD declined for reasons I can't possibly fathom. This is a dumpsite of no particular notability, therefore the article should be deleted. There is no reason to maintain it under
WP:GEO. ♠
PMC♠
(talk)04:15, 6 June 2018 (UTC)reply
Comment I removed the PROD because the original concern (that it incorrectly labeled the subject as a village) was addressed. I did not check for notability. Maybe sources exist in the local languages? –
LaundryPizza03 (
dc̄)
15:25, 6 June 2018 (UTC)reply
Comment the stub as it stands isn't good, but a search did come up with a few sources in three different languages. I'm not saying it's notable or not notable - would this be infrastructure under
WP:GEOFEAT? There's a chance it's notable and could be expanded.
SportingFlyertalk18:26, 6 June 2018 (UTC)reply
Spinningspark, I'd support a merge, but I don't think there's enough substantial coverage (on what you've posted anyway) to support a keep. That book result you posted is a single paragraph in a tour guide type book, it's not that substantive. ♠
PMC♠
(talk)19:58, 9 June 2018 (UTC)reply
Comment. This page originally described Parkietenbos as a village. There is some evidence in sources that this is a populated place as several businesses give it as their address:
Rodoco Shipping and Trading SA[12],
Aruba All Cargo Co.,
Demo Aruba MV,
Ecury Motors, Ltd. This book
description of the dump says the dump is "located in Parkietenbos", not that the dump is called Parkietenbos. As a populated place this should be kept per
WP:GEOLAND. At the very least we can say that there is more going on there than just a dump. Also
Historia di Aruba: 1499-1824 mentions Parkietenbos but I can't make any sense of the google machine translation of "Nan a establece nan mes na diferente lugar, entre otro na Daimari, Santa Marta, Buena Vista y Parkietenbos principalmente. Asina e teranan cerca yama "cunuco" a bin den existencia. Cada colonizador a desaroya nan pida tereno..." At least we can say from that that the place existed historically.
SpinningSpark22:29, 9 June 2018 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.