From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  06:53, 3 July 2017 (UTC) reply

Parikrama Group of Institutions

Parikrama Group of Institutions (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No significant indication of importance. Unsourced, written like an advertisement, especially the sections about their mission and vision, seems to be copied directly from the institution's website. Hayman30 ( talk) 09:05, 17 June 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 09:30, 17 June 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 09:31, 17 June 2017 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, So Why 07:17, 25 June 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Delete per nom. fails WP:ORG. There have been a whole passel of these Indian, for-profit, marginally situated, educational "groups", none of which seem to be the least bit notable. -- Bejnar ( talk) 20:39, 26 June 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Delete shallow coverage in RSs. Rentier ( talk) 11:58, 2 July 2017 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  06:53, 3 July 2017 (UTC) reply

Parikrama Group of Institutions

Parikrama Group of Institutions (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No significant indication of importance. Unsourced, written like an advertisement, especially the sections about their mission and vision, seems to be copied directly from the institution's website. Hayman30 ( talk) 09:05, 17 June 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 09:30, 17 June 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 09:31, 17 June 2017 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, So Why 07:17, 25 June 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Delete per nom. fails WP:ORG. There have been a whole passel of these Indian, for-profit, marginally situated, educational "groups", none of which seem to be the least bit notable. -- Bejnar ( talk) 20:39, 26 June 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Delete shallow coverage in RSs. Rentier ( talk) 11:58, 2 July 2017 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook