The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Whether we consider the sock/IP arguments or not, it seems like there is no evidence of notability; neither hosting a TV show nor appearing in some works do in and of itself establish notability.
Jo-Jo Eumerus (
talk,
contributions) 16:44, 3 September 2019 (UTC)reply
If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to
assume good faith on the part of others and to
sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end.
Irredeemably promotional autobio edited heavily by the subject and several SPAs and despite the claims I can find very little meaningful and independent coverage.
Praxidicae (
talk) 15:14, 19 August 2019 (UTC)reply
This is a real public figure page... He is an Indian personality .Thus, this page should stay. Paras Tomar is an actor from India.. Celebrity — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
175.140.28.249 (
talk •
contribs) 2019-08-19 16:02:13 (UTC)—
175.140.28.249 (
talk) has made
few or no other edits outside this topic.
Someone vandalise this page but I don’t think it’s suitable for deletion . The previous edit , i do believe this page should be maintain with the restrictions of protecting the page . A page that is vandalise unnecessary. Please do look sensitively into it. Do remove the unnecessary items but please retain this page . Thank you very much as this page is truly edited . Thank you & do help in retaining this page .. I’m sure the protection will prevent this page from being vandalised . Thank you .. hoping a great help ! A page that deserves to be retained as due to some recent editing , a page that is visible for years should be retained . Do look into this matter . Thank you — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
2001:d08:1028:54d1:25d4:e982:9f52:4d46 (
talk •
contribs) 2019-08-20 00:29:18 (UTC) —
2001:D08:1028:54D1::/64 (
talk •
contribs) has made
few or no other edits outside this topic.
Weak Keep. It seems he's hosting a TV-Show in India and played in at least one movie and made appearance in few series
[1] -
R3lo sd (
talk) 06:16, 20 August 2019 (UTC)reply
Hosting a show might be great for his career but ultimately has no impact unless he's received actual coverage, which afaict, he has not. Also iMDb is not a reliable source.
Praxidicae (
talk) 13:03, 21 August 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete per nom. Also, @
Praxidicae:, open SPI for person who made page. Sock votes are coming here. --Harshil want to talk? 14:44, 22 August 2019 (UTC)reply
Comment Vote moved from top of page where it was improperly placed.
FoxyGrampa75 (
talk) 00:21, 25 August 2019 (UTC)reply
delete most of the content, and acting credits from the article cant be verified through
reliable sources, the subject fails
WP:NACTOR, as well as
WP:GNG. —usernamekiran
(talk) 23:48, 26 August 2019 (UTC)reply
geez. This article's edit history is full of SPAs since like 2013-14. —usernamekiran
(talk) 00:31, 27 August 2019 (UTC)reply
Weak Keep. He appears to be very popular in India, and appears to have some coverage based on a quick search
Helloimahumanbeing (
talk) 19:51, 27 August 2019 (UTC),Delete Per nom
Helloimahumanbeing (
talk) 00:47, 29 August 2019 (UTC)reply
Praxidicae As I said it was a quick search, looking it up again it doesn't seem like there is that much
Helloimahumanbeing (
talk) 00:47, 29 August 2019 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Ignoring all the sockery, closing this as delete would be defensible at this point, but there's really not that much non-sock discussion here, so another week doesn't seem unreasonable.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, --
RoySmith(talk) 16:11, 27 August 2019 (UTC)reply
comment omg. One more keep vote by an account (not an IP), and this article will not be deleted. —usernamekiran
(talk) 22:19, 27 August 2019 (UTC)reply
For the final time, itunes, imdb and Wikipedia aren't sources. Even if you could use Wikipedia, that article confirms nothing more than someone was able to push some cruft through several years ago.
Praxidicae (
talk) 17:32, 30 August 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Whether we consider the sock/IP arguments or not, it seems like there is no evidence of notability; neither hosting a TV show nor appearing in some works do in and of itself establish notability.
Jo-Jo Eumerus (
talk,
contributions) 16:44, 3 September 2019 (UTC)reply
If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to
assume good faith on the part of others and to
sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end.
Irredeemably promotional autobio edited heavily by the subject and several SPAs and despite the claims I can find very little meaningful and independent coverage.
Praxidicae (
talk) 15:14, 19 August 2019 (UTC)reply
This is a real public figure page... He is an Indian personality .Thus, this page should stay. Paras Tomar is an actor from India.. Celebrity — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
175.140.28.249 (
talk •
contribs) 2019-08-19 16:02:13 (UTC)—
175.140.28.249 (
talk) has made
few or no other edits outside this topic.
Someone vandalise this page but I don’t think it’s suitable for deletion . The previous edit , i do believe this page should be maintain with the restrictions of protecting the page . A page that is vandalise unnecessary. Please do look sensitively into it. Do remove the unnecessary items but please retain this page . Thank you very much as this page is truly edited . Thank you & do help in retaining this page .. I’m sure the protection will prevent this page from being vandalised . Thank you .. hoping a great help ! A page that deserves to be retained as due to some recent editing , a page that is visible for years should be retained . Do look into this matter . Thank you — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
2001:d08:1028:54d1:25d4:e982:9f52:4d46 (
talk •
contribs) 2019-08-20 00:29:18 (UTC) —
2001:D08:1028:54D1::/64 (
talk •
contribs) has made
few or no other edits outside this topic.
Weak Keep. It seems he's hosting a TV-Show in India and played in at least one movie and made appearance in few series
[1] -
R3lo sd (
talk) 06:16, 20 August 2019 (UTC)reply
Hosting a show might be great for his career but ultimately has no impact unless he's received actual coverage, which afaict, he has not. Also iMDb is not a reliable source.
Praxidicae (
talk) 13:03, 21 August 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete per nom. Also, @
Praxidicae:, open SPI for person who made page. Sock votes are coming here. --Harshil want to talk? 14:44, 22 August 2019 (UTC)reply
Comment Vote moved from top of page where it was improperly placed.
FoxyGrampa75 (
talk) 00:21, 25 August 2019 (UTC)reply
delete most of the content, and acting credits from the article cant be verified through
reliable sources, the subject fails
WP:NACTOR, as well as
WP:GNG. —usernamekiran
(talk) 23:48, 26 August 2019 (UTC)reply
geez. This article's edit history is full of SPAs since like 2013-14. —usernamekiran
(talk) 00:31, 27 August 2019 (UTC)reply
Weak Keep. He appears to be very popular in India, and appears to have some coverage based on a quick search
Helloimahumanbeing (
talk) 19:51, 27 August 2019 (UTC),Delete Per nom
Helloimahumanbeing (
talk) 00:47, 29 August 2019 (UTC)reply
Praxidicae As I said it was a quick search, looking it up again it doesn't seem like there is that much
Helloimahumanbeing (
talk) 00:47, 29 August 2019 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Ignoring all the sockery, closing this as delete would be defensible at this point, but there's really not that much non-sock discussion here, so another week doesn't seem unreasonable.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, --
RoySmith(talk) 16:11, 27 August 2019 (UTC)reply
comment omg. One more keep vote by an account (not an IP), and this article will not be deleted. —usernamekiran
(talk) 22:19, 27 August 2019 (UTC)reply
For the final time, itunes, imdb and Wikipedia aren't sources. Even if you could use Wikipedia, that article confirms nothing more than someone was able to push some cruft through several years ago.
Praxidicae (
talk) 17:32, 30 August 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.