The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
correction. The Wikipedia article for the real place was just created. So this was the typical start from a real place and build a hoax on top of it.
• Gene93k (
talk)
15:55, 21 September 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete per nom. Crafty. I've removed it from the Clinton County article, too. 17:55, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Delete, Clay County appears to be the correct one per USGS GNIS. I'd say it was just confusion except the repeated hoaxed of the original author. --
Dual Freq (
talk)
21:20, 21 September 2016 (UTC)reply
Speedy Delete How did we miss this when we blocked him? Several editors, including myself reviewed his contributions. Well, that goes to show you how much garbage this guy made. Kill it with fire.
Smartyllama (
talk)
18:49, 22 September 2016 (UTC)reply
Speedy delete. Like Dual Freq, I too would have
assumed good faith as an innocent error if not for the creator's pattern of serial hoaxing. But it's almost a moot point, as this clearly doesn't actually exist and would therefore still have to be deleted regardless of whether it was a hoax or a good faith mistake.
Bearcat (
talk)
20:39, 26 September 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
correction. The Wikipedia article for the real place was just created. So this was the typical start from a real place and build a hoax on top of it.
• Gene93k (
talk)
15:55, 21 September 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete per nom. Crafty. I've removed it from the Clinton County article, too. 17:55, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Delete, Clay County appears to be the correct one per USGS GNIS. I'd say it was just confusion except the repeated hoaxed of the original author. --
Dual Freq (
talk)
21:20, 21 September 2016 (UTC)reply
Speedy Delete How did we miss this when we blocked him? Several editors, including myself reviewed his contributions. Well, that goes to show you how much garbage this guy made. Kill it with fire.
Smartyllama (
talk)
18:49, 22 September 2016 (UTC)reply
Speedy delete. Like Dual Freq, I too would have
assumed good faith as an innocent error if not for the creator's pattern of serial hoaxing. But it's almost a moot point, as this clearly doesn't actually exist and would therefore still have to be deleted regardless of whether it was a hoax or a good faith mistake.
Bearcat (
talk)
20:39, 26 September 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.