The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Non Notable civil servant. His credibility as an author has not been supplemented by any awards or recognitions. The post held by him is also not significant. Not enough references.
Uncletomwood (
talk) 13:07, 19 November 2014 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar⨹ 15:43, 26 November 2014 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
NorthAmerica1000 19:11, 3 December 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete - fails
WP:V. An attempt to confirm sources that he was some sort of state cabinet minister found nothing.
Bearian (
talk) 20:51, 4 December 2014 (UTC)reply
@
Bearian and
Uncletomwood, any thoughts on these new sources? czar⨹ 06:36, 9 December 2014 (UTC)reply
I'm making no further comment until somebody does the work of fastening those citations into coherent prose in the article.
Bearian (
talk) 15:36, 9 December 2014 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached. Relisting comment: Relisted to allow for analysis of sources presented in the discussion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
NorthAmerica1000 00:41, 11 December 2014 (UTC)reply
I'm still waiting....
Bearian (
talk) 19:29, 16 December 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Non Notable civil servant. His credibility as an author has not been supplemented by any awards or recognitions. The post held by him is also not significant. Not enough references.
Uncletomwood (
talk) 13:07, 19 November 2014 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar⨹ 15:43, 26 November 2014 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
NorthAmerica1000 19:11, 3 December 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete - fails
WP:V. An attempt to confirm sources that he was some sort of state cabinet minister found nothing.
Bearian (
talk) 20:51, 4 December 2014 (UTC)reply
@
Bearian and
Uncletomwood, any thoughts on these new sources? czar⨹ 06:36, 9 December 2014 (UTC)reply
I'm making no further comment until somebody does the work of fastening those citations into coherent prose in the article.
Bearian (
talk) 15:36, 9 December 2014 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached. Relisting comment: Relisted to allow for analysis of sources presented in the discussion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
NorthAmerica1000 00:41, 11 December 2014 (UTC)reply
I'm still waiting....
Bearian (
talk) 19:29, 16 December 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.