- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep. withdrawn by nominator (non-admin closure) Vexations ( talk) 10:55, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Palasia Hotel ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
It's a hotel. There is nothing unique, remarkable or even interesting to say about it. Should we have an article on every hotel merely because it exists? Vexations ( talk) 21:00, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Vexations ( talk) 21:00, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Vexations ( talk) 21:00, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Oceania-related deletion discussions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:05, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Article is sourced, and the hotel is significant for being the tallest in the country.
NemesisAT (
talk)
21:11, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
- Since when is "it has sources" a valid reason to keep? Even is one is a database
[1], another doesn't mention the subject
[2] and another is the hotel's own website?
Vexations (
talk)
21:53, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
- If you search "Palasia" in the book "China in Oceania: Reshaping the Pacific?", it comes up with "Two of Palau's major hotels—the Palasia Hotel and Palau Royal Resort—were developed by Taiwanese. Taiwanese companies also own two middle-range hotels, the Papago Hotel and Airai View Hotel, both in Airai." Sahaib3005 ( talk) 06:59, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
- Since when is "it has sources" a valid reason to keep? Even is one is a database
[1], another doesn't mention the subject
[2] and another is the hotel's own website?
Vexations (
talk)
21:53, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
- Keep, significant (in coverage, timescale, and scope) coverage of the topic exists especially as it relates to politics and international relations. See
[3]
[4].
Horse Eye's Back (
talk)
00:05, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
- That's much better, thanks, Vexations ( talk) 10:53, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep. withdrawn by nominator (non-admin closure) Vexations ( talk) 10:55, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Palasia Hotel ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
It's a hotel. There is nothing unique, remarkable or even interesting to say about it. Should we have an article on every hotel merely because it exists? Vexations ( talk) 21:00, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Vexations ( talk) 21:00, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Vexations ( talk) 21:00, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Oceania-related deletion discussions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:05, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Article is sourced, and the hotel is significant for being the tallest in the country.
NemesisAT (
talk)
21:11, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
- Since when is "it has sources" a valid reason to keep? Even is one is a database
[1], another doesn't mention the subject
[2] and another is the hotel's own website?
Vexations (
talk)
21:53, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
- If you search "Palasia" in the book "China in Oceania: Reshaping the Pacific?", it comes up with "Two of Palau's major hotels—the Palasia Hotel and Palau Royal Resort—were developed by Taiwanese. Taiwanese companies also own two middle-range hotels, the Papago Hotel and Airai View Hotel, both in Airai." Sahaib3005 ( talk) 06:59, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
- Since when is "it has sources" a valid reason to keep? Even is one is a database
[1], another doesn't mention the subject
[2] and another is the hotel's own website?
Vexations (
talk)
21:53, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
- Keep, significant (in coverage, timescale, and scope) coverage of the topic exists especially as it relates to politics and international relations. See
[3]
[4].
Horse Eye's Back (
talk)
00:05, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
- That's much better, thanks, Vexations ( talk) 10:53, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.