The result was merge to Pahasu. nominator has performed a copy-paste merge, closing as merge for attribution purposes — Spaceman Spiff 11:17, 13 September 2011 (UTC) reply
There is no mention of Pahasu as a princely state of India. It was probably an Estate or Zamindari. The google search gives result [ [1] Pahasu as princely state as zero. However, there are mentions of Nawabs of Pahasu, who were zamindars. Further, a page for same place Pahasu, already exists. Therefore, no need to create duplicate page. The creator may add his contents, as History section in Pahasu page. The page name Pahasu State gives a false notion that i.t was a princely state of India. Jethwarp ( talk) 05:04, 23 August 2011 (UTC) Jethwarp ( talk) 05:04, 23 August 2011 (UTC)}} reply
The result was merge to Pahasu. nominator has performed a copy-paste merge, closing as merge for attribution purposes — Spaceman Spiff 11:17, 13 September 2011 (UTC) reply
There is no mention of Pahasu as a princely state of India. It was probably an Estate or Zamindari. The google search gives result [ [1] Pahasu as princely state as zero. However, there are mentions of Nawabs of Pahasu, who were zamindars. Further, a page for same place Pahasu, already exists. Therefore, no need to create duplicate page. The creator may add his contents, as History section in Pahasu page. The page name Pahasu State gives a false notion that i.t was a princely state of India. Jethwarp ( talk) 05:04, 23 August 2011 (UTC) Jethwarp ( talk) 05:04, 23 August 2011 (UTC)}} reply