- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Mkdw talk 19:41, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
AfDs for this article:
- Pacific Xtreme Combat ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable MMA organization. The first AfD was a non-administrative close as 'Keep'. Some felt this was incorrect as consensus was not clear - see the article's Talk page). The issue besides notability was the lack of third party reliable sources which has not been addressed over a year after that first AfD. Peter Rehse ( talk) 11:04, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. Peter Rehse ( talk) 11:04, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
- Delete Minor MMA organization. Besides routine sports reporting, the only coverage is about their broadcast deals. That some of their fights will be available via streaming or on some regional pay TV network doesn't seem like enough to meet GNG. Mdtemp ( talk) 16:27, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
- Delete Having some fighters who were or became notable fight in one of their events does not grant notability to this organization because notability is not inherited. It doesn't really matter what tier this organization is, although the fact that there's a lack of significant independent coverage might explain why it isn't even considered second tier. Papaursa ( talk) 02:57, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 19:14, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 19:14, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 19:14, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 19:14, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Oceania-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 19:14, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
- Delete as per nom and above editors. Searches revealed nothing to show notability. Onel5969 TT me 14:52, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Mkdw talk 19:41, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
AfDs for this article:
- Pacific Xtreme Combat ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable MMA organization. The first AfD was a non-administrative close as 'Keep'. Some felt this was incorrect as consensus was not clear - see the article's Talk page). The issue besides notability was the lack of third party reliable sources which has not been addressed over a year after that first AfD. Peter Rehse ( talk) 11:04, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. Peter Rehse ( talk) 11:04, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
- Delete Minor MMA organization. Besides routine sports reporting, the only coverage is about their broadcast deals. That some of their fights will be available via streaming or on some regional pay TV network doesn't seem like enough to meet GNG. Mdtemp ( talk) 16:27, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
- Delete Having some fighters who were or became notable fight in one of their events does not grant notability to this organization because notability is not inherited. It doesn't really matter what tier this organization is, although the fact that there's a lack of significant independent coverage might explain why it isn't even considered second tier. Papaursa ( talk) 02:57, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 19:14, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 19:14, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 19:14, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 19:14, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Oceania-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 19:14, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
- Delete as per nom and above editors. Searches revealed nothing to show notability. Onel5969 TT me 14:52, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.