- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 03:46, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
PabloDraw
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- PabloDraw ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I don't think this passes WP: N. Previous AfDs didn't reach a consensus, but not a single one of the Keep votes in any of those AfDs actually cites any notability guidelines. HyperAccelerated ( talk) 21:41, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:14, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Unfortunately, it seems this may be yet another WP:BFDI situation. Aaron Liu ( talk) 01:23, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Delete: Searching on Google, DDG, and Kagi, and archive.org texts turned up no WP:SIGCOV in WP:RS. Also the article has been unreferenced since 2004. Previous keep votes weren't based on guidelines. StreetcarEnjoyer (talk) 23:01, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting, not eligible for Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 22:23, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Delete: I don't find coverage for this software package, so not meeting requirements. The other AfD votes don't seen to hold much weight with current guidelines, regardless, there isn't enough coverage to keep this. Oaktree b ( talk) 13:35, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 03:46, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
PabloDraw
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- PabloDraw ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I don't think this passes WP: N. Previous AfDs didn't reach a consensus, but not a single one of the Keep votes in any of those AfDs actually cites any notability guidelines. HyperAccelerated ( talk) 21:41, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:14, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Unfortunately, it seems this may be yet another WP:BFDI situation. Aaron Liu ( talk) 01:23, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Delete: Searching on Google, DDG, and Kagi, and archive.org texts turned up no WP:SIGCOV in WP:RS. Also the article has been unreferenced since 2004. Previous keep votes weren't based on guidelines. StreetcarEnjoyer (talk) 23:01, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting, not eligible for Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 22:23, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Delete: I don't find coverage for this software package, so not meeting requirements. The other AfD votes don't seen to hold much weight with current guidelines, regardless, there isn't enough coverage to keep this. Oaktree b ( talk) 13:35, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.