- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. – filelakeshoe ( t / c) 14:59, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
- Pál Kadosa ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Delete: unsourced article basically comprised of name dropping; notability not established. Quis separabit? 01:23, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
- Keep - There are fairly substantial and sourced articles in French and Hungarian that can be used to expand this with non-English language sources. I'm also seeing mentions in English like this and this, which suggest that he was a fairly important figure in WWII era Hungarian music and in at least one case politics, even if he wasn't widely known outside of Hungary. Along with scores of passing mentions in English, mostly apparently related to his musical contributions or students, and what appear to be a substantial body of non-English mentions (which I can't thoroughly evaluate), this is enough for me to say this probably need attention and not deletion. GMG talk 13:07, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
- Keep, this nomination is nonsense. Definitely notable. -- Norden1990 ( talk) 16:00, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
- Keep – In addition to those encyclopedias already mentioned in the article, he has dedicated entries in Grove. 12 other Wikipedias have an article. -- Michael Bednarek ( talk) 12:06, 6 October 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. – filelakeshoe ( t / c) 14:59, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
- Pál Kadosa ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Delete: unsourced article basically comprised of name dropping; notability not established. Quis separabit? 01:23, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
- Keep - There are fairly substantial and sourced articles in French and Hungarian that can be used to expand this with non-English language sources. I'm also seeing mentions in English like this and this, which suggest that he was a fairly important figure in WWII era Hungarian music and in at least one case politics, even if he wasn't widely known outside of Hungary. Along with scores of passing mentions in English, mostly apparently related to his musical contributions or students, and what appear to be a substantial body of non-English mentions (which I can't thoroughly evaluate), this is enough for me to say this probably need attention and not deletion. GMG talk 13:07, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
- Keep, this nomination is nonsense. Definitely notable. -- Norden1990 ( talk) 16:00, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
- Keep – In addition to those encyclopedias already mentioned in the article, he has dedicated entries in Grove. 12 other Wikipedias have an article. -- Michael Bednarek ( talk) 12:06, 6 October 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.