The result was keep. — CharlotteWebb 17:33, 1 December 2006 (UTC) reply
Anon 88.149.168.128 ( talk · contribs · WHOIS) has expressed doubts about the validity of this term and asked for its deletion, calling it a "hoax" and arguing it is not an established term anywhere. Rather than "hoax", a better term for what he means would probably be "non-notable and unverified neologism". Procedural nomination, no vote from me. Fut.Perf. ☼ 10:46, 28 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. — CharlotteWebb 17:33, 1 December 2006 (UTC) reply
Anon 88.149.168.128 ( talk · contribs · WHOIS) has expressed doubts about the validity of this term and asked for its deletion, calling it a "hoax" and arguing it is not an established term anywhere. Rather than "hoax", a better term for what he means would probably be "non-notable and unverified neologism". Procedural nomination, no vote from me. Fut.Perf. ☼ 10:46, 28 November 2006 (UTC) reply