- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Killiondude ( talk) 08:07, 4 March 2018 (UTC)
Origin Broadband
- Origin Broadband ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not notable enough to pass WP:CORPDEPTH. Fails WP:NCORP. Störm (talk) 06:29, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. MT Train Talk 06:43, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. MT Train Talk 06:43, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. MT Train Talk 06:43, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
- Delete. It is a small company in its sector, the refs don't support notability, the article reads like they are trying to synthesise notability. Szzuk ( talk) 14:08, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Killiondude ( talk) 08:07, 4 March 2018 (UTC)
Origin Broadband
- Origin Broadband ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not notable enough to pass WP:CORPDEPTH. Fails WP:NCORP. Störm (talk) 06:29, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. MT Train Talk 06:43, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. MT Train Talk 06:43, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. MT Train Talk 06:43, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
- Delete. It is a small company in its sector, the refs don't support notability, the article reads like they are trying to synthesise notability. Szzuk ( talk) 14:08, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.