- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 00:49, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Orhan Dragaš
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Orhan Dragaš ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The article has a serious lack of WP:RS, which is why I have doubts about notability. There are only five links, and the last one is the website of his own organization, International Security Institute. HPfan4 ( talk) 04:28, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors and Serbia. AllyD ( talk) 07:01, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗ plicit 05:47, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Delete: Doesn't meet WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR. I Can't say this I'd any way near writing notable books; there was no review also. Safari Scribe Edits! Talk! 17:59, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 00:49, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Orhan Dragaš
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Orhan Dragaš ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The article has a serious lack of WP:RS, which is why I have doubts about notability. There are only five links, and the last one is the website of his own organization, International Security Institute. HPfan4 ( talk) 04:28, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors and Serbia. AllyD ( talk) 07:01, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗ plicit 05:47, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Delete: Doesn't meet WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR. I Can't say this I'd any way near writing notable books; there was no review also. Safari Scribe Edits! Talk! 17:59, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.