The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete --
Malcolmxl5 (
talk) 00:55, 4 January 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete and I frankly would've speedied and or PRODed this as this is exactly the material I've been searching for to nominate for deletion either speedy, PROD or AfD. Searches found nothing at all which is not surprising.
SwisterTwistertalk 05:31, 21 December 2015 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:07, 27 December 2015 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:15, 3 January 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete I get zero hits in Google and news, which is pretty amazing. The references here are to related topics (e.g. "digital") but are not about the company itself.
LaMona (
talk) 02:20, 3 January 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete Based on the lack of third-party sources and no particular coverage coming up in a google search, I would suspect this is a hoax article. Are we even sure this company exists?
Dimadick (
talk) 10:03, 3 January 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete --
Malcolmxl5 (
talk) 00:55, 4 January 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete and I frankly would've speedied and or PRODed this as this is exactly the material I've been searching for to nominate for deletion either speedy, PROD or AfD. Searches found nothing at all which is not surprising.
SwisterTwistertalk 05:31, 21 December 2015 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:07, 27 December 2015 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:15, 3 January 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete I get zero hits in Google and news, which is pretty amazing. The references here are to related topics (e.g. "digital") but are not about the company itself.
LaMona (
talk) 02:20, 3 January 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete Based on the lack of third-party sources and no particular coverage coming up in a google search, I would suspect this is a hoax article. Are we even sure this company exists?
Dimadick (
talk) 10:03, 3 January 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.