From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Good consensus here that even if these places wouldn't meet WP:GEOLAND today, there are sufficient WP:RS showing that they did at some point in the past, and that's all we need. -- RoySmith (talk) 17:21, 11 March 2018 (UTC) reply

Orbitello, Kansas (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Also nominating the following in the same county which also map to farmhouses:

Herman, Kansas (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Pinon, Kansas (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Pleasant Valley, Lincoln County, Kansas (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Towerspring, Kansas (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Another GNIS/post office synthesis in Kansas, but in this case the aerial makes the issue extremely clear: it plunks you down on a farmhouse. GNIS cites "The Official State Atlas of Kansas, Philadelphia: L.H. Everts and Company, 1887", and while I haven't seen this exact map, I've seen similar maps from the same era, and they tend to label residences with the name of the occupant; therefore this "historical locale" is in fact the same farm as exists today. You can call that a "settlement", but it's not a town, and it almost certainly never was a town, and I don't see the notability of every farmhouse in Kansas or anywhere else in the late 1800s that had a name next to it on a map. Mangoe ( talk) 18:09, 23 February 2018 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. MT Train Talk 18:12, 23 February 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Kansas-related deletion discussions. MT Train Talk 18:12, 23 February 2018 (UTC) reply
Please go back and read the nomination this time. The problem isn't that it isn't uninhabited: the problem is that it's still a non-notable farmhouse. Mangoe ( talk) 21:01, 23 February 2018 (UTC) reply
Please do not assume I didn't read the nomination. I did read it, I just disagree with the nomination. I believe the location passes WP:GEOLAND. Nominator seems to agree that the area was inhabited. It may just be a farmhouse today, but it looks like it was a town once upon a time. Likely very small, but enough to hold a US Post Office.-- Paul McDonald ( talk) 21:12, 23 February 2018 (UTC) reply
The problem is it's listed as historical by the GNIS, so the fact it's currently likely non-notable doesn't mean it wasn't once notable. There's even a cemetery, at least at one point in time. SportingFlyer ( talk) 21:25, 23 February 2018 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spartaz Humbug! 21:08, 3 March 2018 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Good consensus here that even if these places wouldn't meet WP:GEOLAND today, there are sufficient WP:RS showing that they did at some point in the past, and that's all we need. -- RoySmith (talk) 17:21, 11 March 2018 (UTC) reply

Orbitello, Kansas (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Also nominating the following in the same county which also map to farmhouses:

Herman, Kansas (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Pinon, Kansas (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Pleasant Valley, Lincoln County, Kansas (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Towerspring, Kansas (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Another GNIS/post office synthesis in Kansas, but in this case the aerial makes the issue extremely clear: it plunks you down on a farmhouse. GNIS cites "The Official State Atlas of Kansas, Philadelphia: L.H. Everts and Company, 1887", and while I haven't seen this exact map, I've seen similar maps from the same era, and they tend to label residences with the name of the occupant; therefore this "historical locale" is in fact the same farm as exists today. You can call that a "settlement", but it's not a town, and it almost certainly never was a town, and I don't see the notability of every farmhouse in Kansas or anywhere else in the late 1800s that had a name next to it on a map. Mangoe ( talk) 18:09, 23 February 2018 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. MT Train Talk 18:12, 23 February 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Kansas-related deletion discussions. MT Train Talk 18:12, 23 February 2018 (UTC) reply
Please go back and read the nomination this time. The problem isn't that it isn't uninhabited: the problem is that it's still a non-notable farmhouse. Mangoe ( talk) 21:01, 23 February 2018 (UTC) reply
Please do not assume I didn't read the nomination. I did read it, I just disagree with the nomination. I believe the location passes WP:GEOLAND. Nominator seems to agree that the area was inhabited. It may just be a farmhouse today, but it looks like it was a town once upon a time. Likely very small, but enough to hold a US Post Office.-- Paul McDonald ( talk) 21:12, 23 February 2018 (UTC) reply
The problem is it's listed as historical by the GNIS, so the fact it's currently likely non-notable doesn't mean it wasn't once notable. There's even a cemetery, at least at one point in time. SportingFlyer ( talk) 21:25, 23 February 2018 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spartaz Humbug! 21:08, 3 March 2018 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook