- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Hey man im josh ( talk) 14:50, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
Optimisation of cutting cycles in conventional underground coal sections to improve productivity
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Optimisation of cutting cycles in conventional underground coal sections to improve productivity ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Minimally referenced. Orphaned for a decade. PepperBeast (talk) 14:31, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. PepperBeast (talk) 14:31, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
- Delete: No evidence of notability, and seems more like an essay than an encyclopedic article. ARandomName123 ( talk)Ping me! 15:33, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
- Delete: Essay, written like it should be in a thesis paper or peer-reviewed journal. Not sure why it zones in on coal mining; it appears to be too specific for an article here. Oaktree b ( talk) 15:53, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
- Delete: Far too niche a topic for Wikipedia, and reads like a primary source; likely either plagiarized or OR. WeirdNAnnoyed ( talk) 00:34, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
- Merge to Coal mining बिनोद थारू ( talk) 00:40, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
- Delete - useful material for another venue -- it's not suited for Wikipedia. बिनोद थारू, this is so specific and technical there's nothing to merge to a general topic article such as Coal mining.
- Oaktree b (pedantry alert): to answer your question, coal is "softer" than most other materials mined under ground such as iron or diamonds so equipment such as continuous miners, roof bolters and longwall equipment are specific to underground coal mining (there are a few minor exceptions such as salt and potash). Mining methods for hard rock mining of materials such as ores are totally different.
- --
A. B. (
talk •
contribs •
global count)
01:28, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
- I appreciate the pedantic. Oaktree b ( talk) 02:20, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Hey man im josh ( talk) 14:50, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
Optimisation of cutting cycles in conventional underground coal sections to improve productivity
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Optimisation of cutting cycles in conventional underground coal sections to improve productivity ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Minimally referenced. Orphaned for a decade. PepperBeast (talk) 14:31, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. PepperBeast (talk) 14:31, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
- Delete: No evidence of notability, and seems more like an essay than an encyclopedic article. ARandomName123 ( talk)Ping me! 15:33, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
- Delete: Essay, written like it should be in a thesis paper or peer-reviewed journal. Not sure why it zones in on coal mining; it appears to be too specific for an article here. Oaktree b ( talk) 15:53, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
- Delete: Far too niche a topic for Wikipedia, and reads like a primary source; likely either plagiarized or OR. WeirdNAnnoyed ( talk) 00:34, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
- Merge to Coal mining बिनोद थारू ( talk) 00:40, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
- Delete - useful material for another venue -- it's not suited for Wikipedia. बिनोद थारू, this is so specific and technical there's nothing to merge to a general topic article such as Coal mining.
- Oaktree b (pedantry alert): to answer your question, coal is "softer" than most other materials mined under ground such as iron or diamonds so equipment such as continuous miners, roof bolters and longwall equipment are specific to underground coal mining (there are a few minor exceptions such as salt and potash). Mining methods for hard rock mining of materials such as ores are totally different.
- --
A. B. (
talk •
contribs •
global count)
01:28, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
- I appreciate the pedantic. Oaktree b ( talk) 02:20, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.