The result was merge to Opinion polling for the Hong Kong legislative election, 2012. Consensus appears to be to merge the 6 articles and to trim the table coding. v/r - T P 08:39, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
A table of opinion pollings of 2012 Hong Kong election in one area. It violates WP:IINFO, and there has been no replies on proposed merged which I initiated. George Ho ( talk) 02:22, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
Now if we're discussing one of the constituencies, than the same should apply for all the others, so I'm also nominating the following related pages:
I'm currently unsure whether to keep or to delete. On the one hand, this is very detailed data on single constituencies. If we'd added this kind of data for all constituencies of every single election worldwide, then we'd have to cope with unmanageable, hardly verifiable masses of data. On the other hand it seems like there was quite some media coverage even on the single constituencies, so it might be justifiable, given the importance for the Hong Kong people. Also, it's not fun to destroy the authors' work if unsure. We might want to refine our notability guidelines to avoid that much work being done to be possibly deleted later. -- PanchoS ( talk) 11:50, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
The result was merge to Opinion polling for the Hong Kong legislative election, 2012. Consensus appears to be to merge the 6 articles and to trim the table coding. v/r - T P 08:39, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
A table of opinion pollings of 2012 Hong Kong election in one area. It violates WP:IINFO, and there has been no replies on proposed merged which I initiated. George Ho ( talk) 02:22, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
Now if we're discussing one of the constituencies, than the same should apply for all the others, so I'm also nominating the following related pages:
I'm currently unsure whether to keep or to delete. On the one hand, this is very detailed data on single constituencies. If we'd added this kind of data for all constituencies of every single election worldwide, then we'd have to cope with unmanageable, hardly verifiable masses of data. On the other hand it seems like there was quite some media coverage even on the single constituencies, so it might be justifiable, given the importance for the Hong Kong people. Also, it's not fun to destroy the authors' work if unsure. We might want to refine our notability guidelines to avoid that much work being done to be possibly deleted later. -- PanchoS ( talk) 11:50, 6 January 2015 (UTC)