The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Pure fancruft created for POV pushing. All of the sources are nothing but invented claims of Pakistani officials not supported by any third party sources. Ratnahastin(
talk)04:18, 17 June 2024 (UTC)reply
3,4,5,8,9,10,16,17 are non-Pakistani sources which include the aforementioned sources including Israeli and Indian but also third party sources including the American air university
Waleed (
talk)
05:18, 17 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete : article lacks significant coverage from independent and reliable sources. The existing sources are primarily from partisan perspectives, failing to establish the article notability.
NxcryptoMessage05:28, 17 June 2024 (UTC)reply
I'm not familiar with the subject but there does appear to be reliable sources covering it e.g.
[1] even if it's a fabricated plot it's still arguably notable.
Traumnovelle (
talk)
08:43, 17 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Comment: I've concerns about articles created by
M Waleed, as they often include WP:OR and rely on questionable sources. Despite
my advice to use drafts instead of creating articles directly in the main namespace, it appears that my suggestions were not followed- hence this AFD nom.
Saqib (
talk I
contribs)
16:30, 17 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: A thorough source analysis would be helpful here given the competing claims of one-sidedness. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, LizRead!Talk!04:06, 1 July 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete: It focuses on a single viewpoint and doesn't have any independent sources to back it up. Maybe this topic could be added to a bigger article, but right now it doesn't seem like it stands on its own.
Waqar💬17:05, 2 July 2024 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Pure fancruft created for POV pushing. All of the sources are nothing but invented claims of Pakistani officials not supported by any third party sources. Ratnahastin(
talk)04:18, 17 June 2024 (UTC)reply
3,4,5,8,9,10,16,17 are non-Pakistani sources which include the aforementioned sources including Israeli and Indian but also third party sources including the American air university
Waleed (
talk)
05:18, 17 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete : article lacks significant coverage from independent and reliable sources. The existing sources are primarily from partisan perspectives, failing to establish the article notability.
NxcryptoMessage05:28, 17 June 2024 (UTC)reply
I'm not familiar with the subject but there does appear to be reliable sources covering it e.g.
[1] even if it's a fabricated plot it's still arguably notable.
Traumnovelle (
talk)
08:43, 17 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Comment: I've concerns about articles created by
M Waleed, as they often include WP:OR and rely on questionable sources. Despite
my advice to use drafts instead of creating articles directly in the main namespace, it appears that my suggestions were not followed- hence this AFD nom.
Saqib (
talk I
contribs)
16:30, 17 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: A thorough source analysis would be helpful here given the competing claims of one-sidedness. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, LizRead!Talk!04:06, 1 July 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete: It focuses on a single viewpoint and doesn't have any independent sources to back it up. Maybe this topic could be added to a bigger article, but right now it doesn't seem like it stands on its own.
Waqar💬17:05, 2 July 2024 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.