- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. SouthernNights ( talk) 15:07, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
Open Source Media Center
- Open Source Media Center ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This seems to me to be an advertisement. It also doesn't really assert its claim for notability. It doesn't explain what it is very well, either. It's disguised effectively, and could become notable, but I don't think it is yet. I hate to suggest it, but I think it should be deleted. -- Magnus Puer ( sermo) 22:39, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
I'm not sure that's fair. OSMC is a popular Pi alternative to OpenELEC which seems to have its own page. It does seem notable (a quick search reveals some mentions in Wall Street Journal and on technical websites as well). Perhaps the article is not neutral, however I do feel it is relevant. According to the Vero website which seems to be an OSMC product, Raspbmc, which is now called OSMC had 200,000 regular users, at least at the time of writing. The http://openelec.tv/ website claims that they have 400,000 users. Granted that these are both sources that would benefit from inflating these numbers. However this does seem to show OSMC is notable. -- User:Tim4345 ( User talk:Tim4345) 01:42, 8 May 2015 (UTC).
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 01:01, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 01:01, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 00:43, 15 May 2015 (UTC)
- Delete I see no attempt to meet WP:N. This does not seem to meet WP:GNG nor any subject-specific guideline. Blue Rasberry (talk) 15:57, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. North America 1000 08:27, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. SouthernNights ( talk) 15:07, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
Open Source Media Center
- Open Source Media Center ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This seems to me to be an advertisement. It also doesn't really assert its claim for notability. It doesn't explain what it is very well, either. It's disguised effectively, and could become notable, but I don't think it is yet. I hate to suggest it, but I think it should be deleted. -- Magnus Puer ( sermo) 22:39, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
I'm not sure that's fair. OSMC is a popular Pi alternative to OpenELEC which seems to have its own page. It does seem notable (a quick search reveals some mentions in Wall Street Journal and on technical websites as well). Perhaps the article is not neutral, however I do feel it is relevant. According to the Vero website which seems to be an OSMC product, Raspbmc, which is now called OSMC had 200,000 regular users, at least at the time of writing. The http://openelec.tv/ website claims that they have 400,000 users. Granted that these are both sources that would benefit from inflating these numbers. However this does seem to show OSMC is notable. -- User:Tim4345 ( User talk:Tim4345) 01:42, 8 May 2015 (UTC).
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 01:01, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 01:01, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 00:43, 15 May 2015 (UTC)
- Delete I see no attempt to meet WP:N. This does not seem to meet WP:GNG nor any subject-specific guideline. Blue Rasberry (talk) 15:57, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. North America 1000 08:27, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.