- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Consensus is that the party is notable and sources exist. ( non-admin closure) -- Dane2007 talk 14:10, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
Ontario Provincial Confederation of Regions Party
- Ontario Provincial Confederation of Regions Party ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article fails to cite sources. The party has never won elected office. Fails WP:ORG. Me-123567-Me ( talk) 21:39, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 07:39, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 07:39, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 07:39, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
- Keep. Further sourcing improvement is certainly still needed, but the article does not "fail to cite sources" — it has sources, and just needs more. And again, our standards for the notability of political parties do not require the party to have won seats; they merely require the party to be properly sourceable as having run candidates. Bearcat ( talk) 00:45, 23 October 2016 (UTC)
- Keep - it has been a registered party for over a quarter of a century, and fielded dozens of candidates. As seven original election articles in Wikipedia refer to this party, readers will be looking for more information. Deleting will not improve Wikipedia. Ground Zero | t 02:28, 23 October 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 00:47, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 00:47, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
- Keep. Sources exist and there's sufficient encyclopedic content to justify maintaining a separate article for the provincial party, rather than merging it back into Confederation of Regions Party of Canada. (Deletion would have been inappropriate in any case.) -- Arxiloxos ( talk) 17:59, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Consensus is that the party is notable and sources exist. ( non-admin closure) -- Dane2007 talk 14:10, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
Ontario Provincial Confederation of Regions Party
- Ontario Provincial Confederation of Regions Party ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article fails to cite sources. The party has never won elected office. Fails WP:ORG. Me-123567-Me ( talk) 21:39, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 07:39, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 07:39, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 07:39, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
- Keep. Further sourcing improvement is certainly still needed, but the article does not "fail to cite sources" — it has sources, and just needs more. And again, our standards for the notability of political parties do not require the party to have won seats; they merely require the party to be properly sourceable as having run candidates. Bearcat ( talk) 00:45, 23 October 2016 (UTC)
- Keep - it has been a registered party for over a quarter of a century, and fielded dozens of candidates. As seven original election articles in Wikipedia refer to this party, readers will be looking for more information. Deleting will not improve Wikipedia. Ground Zero | t 02:28, 23 October 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 00:47, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 00:47, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
- Keep. Sources exist and there's sufficient encyclopedic content to justify maintaining a separate article for the provincial party, rather than merging it back into Confederation of Regions Party of Canada. (Deletion would have been inappropriate in any case.) -- Arxiloxos ( talk) 17:59, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.