From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. North America 1000 11:22, 15 June 2020 (UTC) reply

Onnig Cavoukian

Onnig Cavoukian (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 22:53, 31 May 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 22:53, 31 May 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 22:53, 31 May 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 08:26, 1 June 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 08:26, 1 June 2020 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spartaz Humbug! 21:09, 8 June 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Keep The first reference listed here (which I have detailed a bit further, and linked) is a 2-page feature in the largest newspaper in the country. Some of the other references also appear to be significant, easily meeting GNG. WP:BEFORE failure - did User:Sportsfan 1234 and User:BeamAlexander25 read that Toronto Star article? Nfitz ( talk) 01:31, 14 June 2020 (UTC) reply
    I'll note that the article is not available through the Star's website. I can access it through their Search print archives link which takes me to proquest, courtesy of the Toronto Public Library. It is non-trivial coverage of the subject. GNG is met. Keep. Vexations ( talk) 10:39, 14 June 2020 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 02:47, 15 June 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Keep. The sources added by other editors are great for verifiability and notability. Mysteryman blue 09:09, 15 June 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. North America 1000 11:22, 15 June 2020 (UTC) reply

Onnig Cavoukian

Onnig Cavoukian (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 22:53, 31 May 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 22:53, 31 May 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 22:53, 31 May 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 08:26, 1 June 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 08:26, 1 June 2020 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spartaz Humbug! 21:09, 8 June 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Keep The first reference listed here (which I have detailed a bit further, and linked) is a 2-page feature in the largest newspaper in the country. Some of the other references also appear to be significant, easily meeting GNG. WP:BEFORE failure - did User:Sportsfan 1234 and User:BeamAlexander25 read that Toronto Star article? Nfitz ( talk) 01:31, 14 June 2020 (UTC) reply
    I'll note that the article is not available through the Star's website. I can access it through their Search print archives link which takes me to proquest, courtesy of the Toronto Public Library. It is non-trivial coverage of the subject. GNG is met. Keep. Vexations ( talk) 10:39, 14 June 2020 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 02:47, 15 June 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Keep. The sources added by other editors are great for verifiability and notability. Mysteryman blue 09:09, 15 June 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook