The result was Nomination withdrawn. Network has officially announced block's existence and plenty of neutral industry sources than the usual questionable kidvid blogs now exist. Nate • ( chatter) 01:59, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
This article about a children's program block on The CW allegedly premiering in October is a case of WP:TOOSOON. First source is a clear WP:ADVERT merely mentioning the block has shows ready for purchase but without information about being in production or not, while source #2 has reliability problems in which the article is basically a lot of spec that comes down to 'the companies had no comment on these rumors', while #3 just rewrites the second story for another website while combining #1's program description boilerplates. Another barely more reliable source is available here, but again rehashes #2 with only the addition of a 'yes we're ending the block that precedes it, but no further comment'; no further sources have been found besides that (the rest are mirrors, search term clickbait and YouTube news reaction videos, with only one other newsorg reporting the story as a morning news time-filler sourced by #2). I have attempted to enforce WP:RELIABLE with the editors adding this to Vortexx and The CW and that we're not under a deadline to wait for more info to come out, but to no avail. Nate • ( chatter) 18:39, 3 June 2014 (UTC)
The result was Nomination withdrawn. Network has officially announced block's existence and plenty of neutral industry sources than the usual questionable kidvid blogs now exist. Nate • ( chatter) 01:59, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
This article about a children's program block on The CW allegedly premiering in October is a case of WP:TOOSOON. First source is a clear WP:ADVERT merely mentioning the block has shows ready for purchase but without information about being in production or not, while source #2 has reliability problems in which the article is basically a lot of spec that comes down to 'the companies had no comment on these rumors', while #3 just rewrites the second story for another website while combining #1's program description boilerplates. Another barely more reliable source is available here, but again rehashes #2 with only the addition of a 'yes we're ending the block that precedes it, but no further comment'; no further sources have been found besides that (the rest are mirrors, search term clickbait and YouTube news reaction videos, with only one other newsorg reporting the story as a morning news time-filler sourced by #2). I have attempted to enforce WP:RELIABLE with the editors adding this to Vortexx and The CW and that we're not under a deadline to wait for more info to come out, but to no avail. Nate • ( chatter) 18:39, 3 June 2014 (UTC)