The result of the debate was No consensus. Deathphoenix ʕ 18:00, 30 May 2006 (UTC) reply
Just a bunch of quotations from
On the Jews and Their Lies. There is already an external link to such a collection of excerpts in the original article. I think the work is old enough for there not to be any copyright issues, but if that's the way we want to quarterback this it should be complete and on Wikisource. Wikiquote is an option, too, perhaps, but I would oppose an interwiki redirect. That's not to say that some of the quotes shouldn't be used in the article if they can be incorporated into the text.
savidan
(talk)
(e@)
22:14, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
reply
CTSW, please do not make this into yet another one of your personal attack pages. It is not appropriate. Doright 19:38, 24 May 2006 (UTC) reply"The article currently has a brief summary of a larger article, Martin Luther and Antisemitism, but it appears to me that several editors are trying to either whitewash the contents of the summary, or remove any summary at all, on various grounds which I see as spurious (e.g. we can't quote from works because that might be a copyright violation, or we shouldn't summarize at all because that will increase interest in the sub-article). Jayjg (talk) 18:31, 15 November 2005 (UTC) [4]
Verso of the Title Page, Luther's Works, Vol. 47, "The Christian in Society": (c) 1971 Fortress Press, Library of Congress Number 55-9893, ISBN 0-8006-0347-8
"Public Law 102-307, enacted on June 26, 1992, amended the copyright law to make renewal automatic and renewal registration optional for works originally copyrighted between January 1, 1964 and December 31, 1977." United States Copyright Office, Circular 15
![]() Wikiquote has quotations related to
On the Jews and Their Lies. |
-- MPerel ( talk | contrib) 03:23, 25 May 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was No consensus. Deathphoenix ʕ 18:00, 30 May 2006 (UTC) reply
Just a bunch of quotations from
On the Jews and Their Lies. There is already an external link to such a collection of excerpts in the original article. I think the work is old enough for there not to be any copyright issues, but if that's the way we want to quarterback this it should be complete and on Wikisource. Wikiquote is an option, too, perhaps, but I would oppose an interwiki redirect. That's not to say that some of the quotes shouldn't be used in the article if they can be incorporated into the text.
savidan
(talk)
(e@)
22:14, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
reply
CTSW, please do not make this into yet another one of your personal attack pages. It is not appropriate. Doright 19:38, 24 May 2006 (UTC) reply"The article currently has a brief summary of a larger article, Martin Luther and Antisemitism, but it appears to me that several editors are trying to either whitewash the contents of the summary, or remove any summary at all, on various grounds which I see as spurious (e.g. we can't quote from works because that might be a copyright violation, or we shouldn't summarize at all because that will increase interest in the sub-article). Jayjg (talk) 18:31, 15 November 2005 (UTC) [4]
Verso of the Title Page, Luther's Works, Vol. 47, "The Christian in Society": (c) 1971 Fortress Press, Library of Congress Number 55-9893, ISBN 0-8006-0347-8
"Public Law 102-307, enacted on June 26, 1992, amended the copyright law to make renewal automatic and renewal registration optional for works originally copyrighted between January 1, 1964 and December 31, 1977." United States Copyright Office, Circular 15
![]() Wikiquote has quotations related to
On the Jews and Their Lies. |
-- MPerel ( talk | contrib) 03:23, 25 May 2006 (UTC) reply