The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Deleting per
WP:COMPANY - does not meet notability guidelines. There are three references on the article; the last two references are dead. Article is rather promotional in nature and the company's website has been taken offline. The article doesn't give any evidence for notability and nor can I find any. st170etalk 23:38, 18 May 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete I found a unsourced revision a couple of months ago that said the company was out of business, which I tend to believe. I also found on the originators talk page that the article was speedily deleted for lack of notability a couple of weeks before this version was created. I'm not sure how that happened, but it still fails.
MB (
talk) 21:41, 19 May 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete One detailed source is not enough for notability. Plenty of time has gone by and there should be a lot more coverage at this point if it were notable. I don't see it. --
RM 03:23, 22 May 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete as nothing at all here convincing of the applicable notability.
SwisterTwistertalk 21:47, 25 May 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Deleting per
WP:COMPANY - does not meet notability guidelines. There are three references on the article; the last two references are dead. Article is rather promotional in nature and the company's website has been taken offline. The article doesn't give any evidence for notability and nor can I find any. st170etalk 23:38, 18 May 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete I found a unsourced revision a couple of months ago that said the company was out of business, which I tend to believe. I also found on the originators talk page that the article was speedily deleted for lack of notability a couple of weeks before this version was created. I'm not sure how that happened, but it still fails.
MB (
talk) 21:41, 19 May 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete One detailed source is not enough for notability. Plenty of time has gone by and there should be a lot more coverage at this point if it were notable. I don't see it. --
RM 03:23, 22 May 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete as nothing at all here convincing of the applicable notability.
SwisterTwistertalk 21:47, 25 May 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.