The result was Keep, in absence of any deletion argument, advising the currently inactive nominator nevertheless about WP:POINT. Tikiwont ( talk) 10:55, 29 February 2008 (UTC) reply
I have nominated Omega Phi Gamma, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Omega Phi Gamma. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Cruzer8 ( talk) 06:47, 21 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Keep, in absence of any deletion argument, advising the currently inactive nominator nevertheless about WP:POINT. Tikiwont ( talk) 10:55, 29 February 2008 (UTC) reply
I have nominated Omega Phi Gamma, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Omega Phi Gamma. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Cruzer8 ( talk) 06:47, 21 February 2008 (UTC) reply