The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman ( talk) 02:43, 6 August 2009 (UTC) reply
Non-notable product. Gordonrox24 | Talk 02:46, 30 July 2009 (UTC) reply
Delete per nom.
Mlh56880 (
talk) 04:21, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
reply
Keep completely disagree with the nominator as well as the "per nom" redlink editor, whom, as of this posting, has made less than twenty edits to Wikipedia. While I've never been one for the arcade, even I know about this game. It was a very popular game back in the day and already somewhat historical by the early 1990s. It's name has to this date been preserved in gaming history. Furthermore, it has been a very influential game much like
Pac-man has been. Definitley notable, no questions asked and deleting it would be a dishonor to Wikipedia's notability policies.--
The Legendary
Sky Attacker 04:36, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
reply
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman ( talk) 02:43, 6 August 2009 (UTC) reply
Non-notable product. Gordonrox24 | Talk 02:46, 30 July 2009 (UTC) reply
Delete per nom.
Mlh56880 (
talk) 04:21, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
reply
Keep completely disagree with the nominator as well as the "per nom" redlink editor, whom, as of this posting, has made less than twenty edits to Wikipedia. While I've never been one for the arcade, even I know about this game. It was a very popular game back in the day and already somewhat historical by the early 1990s. It's name has to this date been preserved in gaming history. Furthermore, it has been a very influential game much like
Pac-man has been. Definitley notable, no questions asked and deleting it would be a dishonor to Wikipedia's notability policies.--
The Legendary
Sky Attacker 04:36, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
reply