The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Merge to
List of Greyhawk deities. I'll note that this was done to
Hextor a little bit ago, and stipulate that most of these fictional deities are not likely to have independent RS'ing, and merging ALL of them in a consistent manner is likely a better use of our time than repeated AfD's.
Jclemens (
talk) 21:11, 18 June 2016 (UTC)reply
If someone wants to do it, I'll hold off on AfDs. If you can get a consensus I can refer to in the edit summaries, I'll do it myself. It's just that nobody ever actually follows through with doing it.
TTN (
talk) 01:05, 19 June 2016 (UTC)reply
You know, TTN, if you exercised due care and appropriate editing with the mergers, I'd be quite impressed, as I don't recall seeing such work from you before. I won't revert them.
Jclemens (
talk) 16:06, 19 June 2016 (UTC)reply
Merge or redirect as above, until there is evidence of independent notability.
Josh Milburn (
talk) 07:26, 20 June 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Merge to
List of Greyhawk deities. I'll note that this was done to
Hextor a little bit ago, and stipulate that most of these fictional deities are not likely to have independent RS'ing, and merging ALL of them in a consistent manner is likely a better use of our time than repeated AfD's.
Jclemens (
talk) 21:11, 18 June 2016 (UTC)reply
If someone wants to do it, I'll hold off on AfDs. If you can get a consensus I can refer to in the edit summaries, I'll do it myself. It's just that nobody ever actually follows through with doing it.
TTN (
talk) 01:05, 19 June 2016 (UTC)reply
You know, TTN, if you exercised due care and appropriate editing with the mergers, I'd be quite impressed, as I don't recall seeing such work from you before. I won't revert them.
Jclemens (
talk) 16:06, 19 June 2016 (UTC)reply
Merge or redirect as above, until there is evidence of independent notability.
Josh Milburn (
talk) 07:26, 20 June 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.