- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Pepin Garcia. Liz Read! Talk! 08:48, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Old Henry ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Mostly promotional article that doesn't seem to pass WP:GNG or WP:NPRODUCT; database mentions and promotional material is what I can find online. Nythar ( 💬- 🎃) 08:52, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Products and Nicaragua. Nythar ( 💬- 🎃) 08:52, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 08:03, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
- Redirect to Pepin Garcia, the maker. As of now with zero sources beyond catalogs it doesn't merit a standalone article but I'm not convinced one couldn't be written on the topic, so a redirect to the manufacturer (who is definitely notable) leaves the history intact if someone wants to take another stab at an article thats properly sourced. -- WhoIs 127.0.0.1 ping/ loopback 09:19, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per above; fails GNG, overtly promotional. No sign of real significance outside of the fact that the product exists. Also fine with redirecting to Garcia if there is support for that. ‡ El cid, el campeador talk 15:31, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Pepin Garcia. Liz Read! Talk! 08:48, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Old Henry ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Mostly promotional article that doesn't seem to pass WP:GNG or WP:NPRODUCT; database mentions and promotional material is what I can find online. Nythar ( 💬- 🎃) 08:52, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Products and Nicaragua. Nythar ( 💬- 🎃) 08:52, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 08:03, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
- Redirect to Pepin Garcia, the maker. As of now with zero sources beyond catalogs it doesn't merit a standalone article but I'm not convinced one couldn't be written on the topic, so a redirect to the manufacturer (who is definitely notable) leaves the history intact if someone wants to take another stab at an article thats properly sourced. -- WhoIs 127.0.0.1 ping/ loopback 09:19, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per above; fails GNG, overtly promotional. No sign of real significance outside of the fact that the product exists. Also fine with redirecting to Garcia if there is support for that. ‡ El cid, el campeador talk 15:31, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.