- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Sourcing issue has been addressed. Sandstein 18:16, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
- Ojok-tong ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No indication of importance, no sources [ Username Needed 10:31, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of North Korea-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 13:17, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Korea-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 13:17, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 13:17, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
- Keep - This does appear to be a real and distinct population center. G-maps has a "Ojok-to" almost exactly where the
NGA source in the article has this town.
[1] Contrary to the nom, the NGA link is a source. And the English language
NK News has a story about Ojok Island and mentions there's a collective on it.
[2] --
Oakshade (
talk)
01:51, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
- In fairness to the nominator, I added the NGA source after they raised this. Mortee ( talk) 09:19, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
- Keep It does have some data now. -- Garam ( talk) 06:11, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Sourcing issue has been addressed. Sandstein 18:16, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
- Ojok-tong ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No indication of importance, no sources [ Username Needed 10:31, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of North Korea-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 13:17, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Korea-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 13:17, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 13:17, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
- Keep - This does appear to be a real and distinct population center. G-maps has a "Ojok-to" almost exactly where the
NGA source in the article has this town.
[1] Contrary to the nom, the NGA link is a source. And the English language
NK News has a story about Ojok Island and mentions there's a collective on it.
[2] --
Oakshade (
talk)
01:51, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
- In fairness to the nominator, I added the NGA source after they raised this. Mortee ( talk) 09:19, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
- Keep It does have some data now. -- Garam ( talk) 06:11, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.