The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete While I don't trust google for all purposes because many obscure matters such as this will not recieve many hits, I am compelled to take
I do not exist's view that it is likely a personal script.
AdamBiswanger1 13:26, 24 July 2006 (UTC)reply
Delete No references, potentially
WP:NOR; Doesn't make an assertion to notability. --
Porqin 13:26, 24 July 2006 (UTC)reply
Delete pending sources provided by article creator. I've never heard of the term, and the references in
calligraphy and
ogham were both added by anons who have done naught else. Seems like a premature article, though I'd be happy to be proven wrong. --
nae'blis(talk) 05:12, 25 July 2006 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete While I don't trust google for all purposes because many obscure matters such as this will not recieve many hits, I am compelled to take
I do not exist's view that it is likely a personal script.
AdamBiswanger1 13:26, 24 July 2006 (UTC)reply
Delete No references, potentially
WP:NOR; Doesn't make an assertion to notability. --
Porqin 13:26, 24 July 2006 (UTC)reply
Delete pending sources provided by article creator. I've never heard of the term, and the references in
calligraphy and
ogham were both added by anons who have done naught else. Seems like a premature article, though I'd be happy to be proven wrong. --
nae'blis(talk) 05:12, 25 July 2006 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.