The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep.
Courcelles 00:05, 12 November 2011 (UTC)reply
Close as a complete waste of time. It's released tomorrow, and will almost certainly be a hit in next weekend's chart. If there's nothing to justify an article in 10 days time bring it back here.--
Michig (
talk) 08:44, 5 November 2011 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep.
Courcelles 00:05, 12 November 2011 (UTC)reply
Close as a complete waste of time. It's released tomorrow, and will almost certainly be a hit in next weekend's chart. If there's nothing to justify an article in 10 days time bring it back here.--
Michig (
talk) 08:44, 5 November 2011 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.