- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Vanamonde ( talk) 04:50, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Oekaki ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Something to do with Japan and pictures. Begins as a WP:DICDEF, then goes on about a type of Japanese imageboard. Google indicates that this is a thing that exists (and also a sewing machine), but not that it is a notable thing, in the sense of having substantial coverage in reliable sources. The content is essentially unsourced, and the one source that looks reliable does not mention "oekaki". The German and French articles are more coherent, but even more unsourced. Probably best deleted on account of the WP:V and WP:N problems, and then recreated from scratch once somebody does find decent sources. Sandstein 22:12, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. Eastmain ( talk • contribs) 22:43, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
- Delete The article seems confused about its subject, mostly because it is attempting to talk about a general thing (online drawing programs) from the perspective of a very narrow set of users (anime fans on a few BBSes and sites). If it's about the general thing, it's completely inadequate, and if it's about the narrow set of users, then it could be a sentence or two in a different article. Talk history does not instill confidence in the content. WP:TNT time. Bakazaka ( talk) 22:49, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
- Delete I agree that it is merely a glorified dicdef. The Wiktionary entry is enough. ZXCVBNM ( TALK) 22:57, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 10:08, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Vanamonde ( talk) 04:50, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Oekaki ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Something to do with Japan and pictures. Begins as a WP:DICDEF, then goes on about a type of Japanese imageboard. Google indicates that this is a thing that exists (and also a sewing machine), but not that it is a notable thing, in the sense of having substantial coverage in reliable sources. The content is essentially unsourced, and the one source that looks reliable does not mention "oekaki". The German and French articles are more coherent, but even more unsourced. Probably best deleted on account of the WP:V and WP:N problems, and then recreated from scratch once somebody does find decent sources. Sandstein 22:12, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. Eastmain ( talk • contribs) 22:43, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
- Delete The article seems confused about its subject, mostly because it is attempting to talk about a general thing (online drawing programs) from the perspective of a very narrow set of users (anime fans on a few BBSes and sites). If it's about the general thing, it's completely inadequate, and if it's about the narrow set of users, then it could be a sentence or two in a different article. Talk history does not instill confidence in the content. WP:TNT time. Bakazaka ( talk) 22:49, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
- Delete I agree that it is merely a glorified dicdef. The Wiktionary entry is enough. ZXCVBNM ( TALK) 22:57, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 10:08, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.