- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 03:24, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Nuvei ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Definitely does not pass NCOPR criteria; overlinked with promotional and spam websites. WP:COI though template has been recently removed without any reason Dark Juliorik ( talk) 14:38, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
- Keep – Meets NCORP. The quality of the article has declined since I created it but this company is notable. This company is now even WP:LISTED and "sufficient independent sources almost always exist for such companies". This is certainly the case here because this company was notable even before it had its current name. [1] [2] [3] --- C& C ( Coffeeandcrumbs) 15:04, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Canada. Shellwood ( talk) 15:06, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗ plicit 23:51, 14 September 2022 (UTC)Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 22:40, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
- Hesitant Keep – More should be cleaned up, but they seem to have significant and diverse coverage in regional news sites (e.g. CBC coverage of IPO, Globe and Mail coverage of "one of the largest annual pay packages in Canadian history", and Toronto Star coverage of battle with short seller. Pegnawl ( talk) 15:09, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 03:24, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Nuvei ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Definitely does not pass NCOPR criteria; overlinked with promotional and spam websites. WP:COI though template has been recently removed without any reason Dark Juliorik ( talk) 14:38, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
- Keep – Meets NCORP. The quality of the article has declined since I created it but this company is notable. This company is now even WP:LISTED and "sufficient independent sources almost always exist for such companies". This is certainly the case here because this company was notable even before it had its current name. [1] [2] [3] --- C& C ( Coffeeandcrumbs) 15:04, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Canada. Shellwood ( talk) 15:06, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗ plicit 23:51, 14 September 2022 (UTC)Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 22:40, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
- Hesitant Keep – More should be cleaned up, but they seem to have significant and diverse coverage in regional news sites (e.g. CBC coverage of IPO, Globe and Mail coverage of "one of the largest annual pay packages in Canadian history", and Toronto Star coverage of battle with short seller. Pegnawl ( talk) 15:09, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.