- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- RoySmith (talk) 23:50, 3 June 2014 (UTC)
- Nutri Ventures Corporation ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
it is fairly obvious advertisement, and poorly written. Badger2424 ( talk) 04:47, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
- Comment After reading about different deletion processes, I decided to nominate this article for deletion. That is why you may see that I had previously nominated this for Speedy Deletion and other processes. If that is still active, could someone message me on my talk page about how to delete this? Thanks! Badger2424 ( talk) 04:49, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
- Comment Not sure where I stand on this yet. I found this HuffPost article that talks briefly about the company, but I don't think it would qualify as "significant coverage" per the general notability guideline. I also found this source and this one but again, it seems like these are passing mentions. (They can be translated via Google translate.) So far I don't think enough information has been provided in the article to demonstrate that it meets WP:CORP either. Maybe some more info could be gleaned from the Portuguese Wikipedia here? Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 05:11, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
- Comment: I ran into issues when searching for sources for the television show. I searched only under "Nutri Ventures", so hits for the company did come up with the show mention. However they were the same as the ones for the show: mostly press releases and unusable sources. If the article for the television show is kept, I'd recommend redirecting there since that's literally the only thing this company is known for and seems to be its sole reason for existing. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:14, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Portugal-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 16:35, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 16:36, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 16:36, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 16:36, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
-
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar ♔ 16:59, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
-
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar ♔ 03:24, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
- Delete: Article is not sourced at all, and is very poorly worded. Johnny338 ( talk) 16:50, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- RoySmith (talk) 23:50, 3 June 2014 (UTC)
- Nutri Ventures Corporation ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
it is fairly obvious advertisement, and poorly written. Badger2424 ( talk) 04:47, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
- Comment After reading about different deletion processes, I decided to nominate this article for deletion. That is why you may see that I had previously nominated this for Speedy Deletion and other processes. If that is still active, could someone message me on my talk page about how to delete this? Thanks! Badger2424 ( talk) 04:49, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
- Comment Not sure where I stand on this yet. I found this HuffPost article that talks briefly about the company, but I don't think it would qualify as "significant coverage" per the general notability guideline. I also found this source and this one but again, it seems like these are passing mentions. (They can be translated via Google translate.) So far I don't think enough information has been provided in the article to demonstrate that it meets WP:CORP either. Maybe some more info could be gleaned from the Portuguese Wikipedia here? Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 05:11, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
- Comment: I ran into issues when searching for sources for the television show. I searched only under "Nutri Ventures", so hits for the company did come up with the show mention. However they were the same as the ones for the show: mostly press releases and unusable sources. If the article for the television show is kept, I'd recommend redirecting there since that's literally the only thing this company is known for and seems to be its sole reason for existing. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:14, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Portugal-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 16:35, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 16:36, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 16:36, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 16:36, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
-
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar ♔ 16:59, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
-
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar ♔ 03:24, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
- Delete: Article is not sourced at all, and is very poorly worded. Johnny338 ( talk) 16:50, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.